Articles - Special Issue

Interactive whiteboards and multimedia educational innovation


Abstract


How the IWB can 'help to meet the educational and pedagogical issues that teachers today are facing adover and can be briefly summarized by questions such as how to improve the results scolasticidegli students and let them reach educational success? ? obvious that a technological resource, also versatile and full of potential 'alone can not' provide solutions. The authors analyze the potential 'of LIM in relation to different types of innovazionedidattica, focusing in particular on the collaborative construction of knowledge, the cuidifficolta' piu'da implementation result of a particular epistemological status of traditional learning not from the will '/ ability' of individual teachers. Finally vieneproposto a trial scheme for the area storicogeografica, in which aspects of teaching more 'traditional vengonoconiugati with the most' innovative, giving tips on how to use the new technology.

Keywords

Educational Technology; Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL); School Innovation; Technological innovation and education; collaborative knowledge construction; epistemology of didactics; interactive whiteboard;

Full Text:

PDF (Italiano)


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/298

References


Bloom B. S. (1993). Personalizzare l’insegnamento. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Gardner H. (1993). Educare al comprendere. Milano: Feltrinelli.

Ginzburg C. (2000). Rapporti di forza. Storia, retorica, prova. Milano: Feltrinelli.

INVALSI (2007). Le competenze in scienze lettura e matematica degli studenti quindicenni. Rapporto nazionale Pisa 2006. Roma: Armando Editore.

Magner T. (2009). School 2.0: Technology and the future of the school. Comunicazione presentata al convegno Un giorno di scuola nel 2020 (Torino, 26 - 27 marzo 2009), URL: http://www.fondazionescuola.it/magnoliaPublic/ iniziative/convegno-26-27marzo/Timothy-Magner/video-1.html (ultima consultazione 27.12.2009).

Maslow A. H. (1966). The Psychology of Science: A Reconnaissance. New York: Harper & Row.

Mernissi F. (2000). L’harem e l’occidente. Firenze: Giunti. M.P.I (2007). Indicazioni per il curricolo per la scuola d’infanzia e per il primo ciclo d’istruzione. Roma: Tecnodid.

Pontecorvo C., Ajello A., Zucchermaglio C. (2007). Discutendo si impara. Interazione sociale e conoscenza a scuola. Roma: Carocci. Scuola di Barbiana, (1967). Lettera a una professoressa. Firenze: Libreria Editrice Fiorentina.

Tutiaux-Guillon N. (2008). Interpréter la stabilité d’une discipline scolaire: l’histoire-géographie dans le secondaire français. In F. Audigier, N. Tutiaux-Guillon (eds.). Compétences et contenus. Les curriculums en question. Bruxelles: Editions De Broeck Université, pp. 117-146.

Unesco (2002). Information and communication technologies in teacher education, URL: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001295/129533 e.pdf (ultima consultazione 27.12.2009).

Valzania S. (2005). Austerlitz. Milano: Mondadori.


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2015 TD Tecnologie Didattiche

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Italian Journal of Educational Technology (IJET) | ISSN (print) 2532-4632 | ISSN (online) 2532-7720