Computer Mediated Communication as a resource in the University

Main Article Content

John Corbett
Celia Duffy
Erica McAteer
Andrew Tolmie


Discussion on the effectiveness of teaching Computer Mediated Communication (CMC) by analyzing the role of cultural context into which a portion. The authors propose a detailed evaluation of this resource to be taken into account the large medium, participants and context.

Article Details

Articles - Special Issue


Barley Z. & Jenness M. (1993). Cluster evaluation: a method to strengthen evaluation in smaller programs with similar purposes. Evaluation Practice, vol. 14, 141-147.

Beattie G.W. (1982). The dynamics of university tutorial groups. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, vol. 35, 147-150.

Brown A.L. & Campione J.C. (1988). Communities of learning and thinking: or a context by any other name. Contributions to Human Development, vol. 21, 108-126.

Crook C. (1994). Computers and the Collaborative Experience of Learning. London, Routledge.

Duffy C., Arnold S. & Henderson, F. (1995). NetSem: Electrifying undergraduate seminars. In Active Learning vol. 2. Oxford, CTISS Publications.

Gaver W.W. (1992). The affordances of media spaces for collaboration. In CSCW ‘92: Sharing Perspectives Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Toronto.

Gibson J.J. (1966). The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. London: George Allen & Unwin.

Kaye A. (1989). Computer-mediated communication and distance education. In R. Mason & A. Kaye (Eds.), Mind-weave. Oxford, Pergammon Press.

Lave J. & Wenger E. (1991). Situated Learning Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mantovani G. (1996). New Communication Environments. London: Taylor & Francis.

Rutter D.R., Stephenson G.M. & Dewley M.E. (1981). Visual communication and the content and style of conversation. British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 20, 41-52.

Spears R. & Lea M. (1992). Social influence in CMC. In M.Lea (Ed.), Contexts of Computer-Mediated Communication. London: Harvester.