Gender, Identity and CMC
Article Sidebar
Published
Jan 1, 1997
Main Article Content
Abstract
Reflections on the concept of identity 'in computer-mediated communication. The indicators of our identity 'may disappear? According to the author, in this context, the way we use language, the themes we choose and how we face emerge clear signs of our identity 'office.
Article Details
Section
Articles - Special Issue
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
References
Cherny L. and Reba Weise E., Eds. (1996). Wired Women: Gender and New Realities in Cyberspace, Amazon.com.
Clarke V. A. and G. J. Teague (1996). “Characterizations of computing careers students and professionals disagree.” Computers & education, vol. 26(4): 241-246.
Colley A., Hill F., et al. (1995). “Gender effects in the stereotyping of those with different kinds of computing experience.” Journal of educational computing research, vol. 12(1): 19-27.
Collins-Jarvis L. A. (1993). “Gender Representation in an Electronic City Hall: Female Adoption of Santa Monica’s PEN System.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, (Winter): 49-63.
Connell R. (1987). Gender and power. Cambridge, Polity.
Connell R. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge, Polity.
Daft R. L. and Lengel R. H. (1986). “Organisational information requirement, media richness and structural determinants.” Management Science, vol. 32: 554-571.
DeLoach A. (1996). Grrrls Exude Attitute. CMC Magazine.
Durndell A., Glissov P. et al. (1995). “Gender and computing persisting differences.” Educational research, vol. 37(3): 219-227.
Durndell A. and Lightbody P. (1993). “Gender and computing change over time.” Computers & Education, vol. 21(4): 331-336.
Durndell, A. and Thomson K. (1997). “Gender and computing: A decade of change?” Computers & education, vol. 28(1): 1-9.
Edley N. and Wetherell M.(1995). Men in perpective: Practice, power and identity. London, Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Gergen, K. (1991). The saturated self: dilemmas of identity in contemporary life.
Giddens A. (1991). Modernity and selfidentity: Self and society in the late modern age, Polity.
Goyal A. (1996). “Women in computing historical roles, the perpetual glass ceiling, and current opportunities.” IEEE annals of the history of computing, vol. 8(3): 36-42.
Habermas J. (1984). The Theory Of Communicative Action: Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalisation of Society, Heinemann Press.
Habermas J. (1987). The Theory Of Communicative Action: Volume 2: Lifeworld and System: A critique of funtionalist reason, Polity Press.
Herring S. (1992). “Gender and participation in ComputerMediated Linguistic Discourse.” ERIC Clearing House on Languages and Linguistics (October).
Herring S. (1993). Culture vs. Technology, or Why Computer-Mediated Communication Is Still Sexist. International Pragmatics Conference, Kobe, Japan.
Johansen R. (1977). “Social evaluations of teleconferencing.” Telecommunications Policy vol. 1: 395-419.
Kiesler S. (1986). “The hidden messages in computer networks.” Harvard Business Review (JanFeb): pp. 46-58.
Kiesler S., Siegel J., et al. (1984). “Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communications.” American Psychologist, vol. 39: 1123-1134.
Lorber J. and Farrell S. A. (1991). The social construction of gender.
Poster M. (1990). The Mode of Information, Polity Press.
Rice R. E. (1984). The new media: Communication research and technology.
Rice R. E. and Love G. (1987). “Electricemotion: socio-emotional content in a computer mediated communication network.” Communication research, vol. 14: 85-108.
Rutter D. R. (1984). Looking and seeing: The role of visual communication in social interaction.
Rutter D. R. (1987). “Communicating by telephone.”.
Spears R. and Lea M. (1992). Social influence in CMC. Contexts of ComputerMediated Communication. M. Lea.
Turkle S. (1996). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet.
Wyatt N. (1993). Small Group Dynamics In A Women’s Studies Hotline. International Pragmatics Conference, Kobe, Japan.
Yates S. J. (1996). Oral and literate linguistic aspects of CMC discourse: A corpus based study. Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social, and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. S. Herring, Benjamins.
Yates S. J. (in stampa). “Gender, language and CMC for Education.” L earning and Instruction.
Yates S. J. (in stampa). Networked Communication: The sociolinguistics of computer-mediated communication, SUNY.
Yates S. J. and Graddol D. J. (1996). “I read this chat is heavy”: the discursive construction of identity in CMC. International Pragmatics Association, Mexico.
Zuboff S. (1988). In the Age of the Smart Machine: The future of work and power, Heinemann.
Clarke V. A. and G. J. Teague (1996). “Characterizations of computing careers students and professionals disagree.” Computers & education, vol. 26(4): 241-246.
Colley A., Hill F., et al. (1995). “Gender effects in the stereotyping of those with different kinds of computing experience.” Journal of educational computing research, vol. 12(1): 19-27.
Collins-Jarvis L. A. (1993). “Gender Representation in an Electronic City Hall: Female Adoption of Santa Monica’s PEN System.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, (Winter): 49-63.
Connell R. (1987). Gender and power. Cambridge, Polity.
Connell R. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge, Polity.
Daft R. L. and Lengel R. H. (1986). “Organisational information requirement, media richness and structural determinants.” Management Science, vol. 32: 554-571.
DeLoach A. (1996). Grrrls Exude Attitute. CMC Magazine.
Durndell A., Glissov P. et al. (1995). “Gender and computing persisting differences.” Educational research, vol. 37(3): 219-227.
Durndell A. and Lightbody P. (1993). “Gender and computing change over time.” Computers & Education, vol. 21(4): 331-336.
Durndell, A. and Thomson K. (1997). “Gender and computing: A decade of change?” Computers & education, vol. 28(1): 1-9.
Edley N. and Wetherell M.(1995). Men in perpective: Practice, power and identity. London, Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Gergen, K. (1991). The saturated self: dilemmas of identity in contemporary life.
Giddens A. (1991). Modernity and selfidentity: Self and society in the late modern age, Polity.
Goyal A. (1996). “Women in computing historical roles, the perpetual glass ceiling, and current opportunities.” IEEE annals of the history of computing, vol. 8(3): 36-42.
Habermas J. (1984). The Theory Of Communicative Action: Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalisation of Society, Heinemann Press.
Habermas J. (1987). The Theory Of Communicative Action: Volume 2: Lifeworld and System: A critique of funtionalist reason, Polity Press.
Herring S. (1992). “Gender and participation in ComputerMediated Linguistic Discourse.” ERIC Clearing House on Languages and Linguistics (October).
Herring S. (1993). Culture vs. Technology, or Why Computer-Mediated Communication Is Still Sexist. International Pragmatics Conference, Kobe, Japan.
Johansen R. (1977). “Social evaluations of teleconferencing.” Telecommunications Policy vol. 1: 395-419.
Kiesler S. (1986). “The hidden messages in computer networks.” Harvard Business Review (JanFeb): pp. 46-58.
Kiesler S., Siegel J., et al. (1984). “Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communications.” American Psychologist, vol. 39: 1123-1134.
Lorber J. and Farrell S. A. (1991). The social construction of gender.
Poster M. (1990). The Mode of Information, Polity Press.
Rice R. E. (1984). The new media: Communication research and technology.
Rice R. E. and Love G. (1987). “Electricemotion: socio-emotional content in a computer mediated communication network.” Communication research, vol. 14: 85-108.
Rutter D. R. (1984). Looking and seeing: The role of visual communication in social interaction.
Rutter D. R. (1987). “Communicating by telephone.”.
Spears R. and Lea M. (1992). Social influence in CMC. Contexts of ComputerMediated Communication. M. Lea.
Turkle S. (1996). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet.
Wyatt N. (1993). Small Group Dynamics In A Women’s Studies Hotline. International Pragmatics Conference, Kobe, Japan.
Yates S. J. (1996). Oral and literate linguistic aspects of CMC discourse: A corpus based study. Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social, and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. S. Herring, Benjamins.
Yates S. J. (in stampa). “Gender, language and CMC for Education.” L earning and Instruction.
Yates S. J. (in stampa). Networked Communication: The sociolinguistics of computer-mediated communication, SUNY.
Yates S. J. and Graddol D. J. (1996). “I read this chat is heavy”: the discursive construction of identity in CMC. International Pragmatics Association, Mexico.
Zuboff S. (1988). In the Age of the Smart Machine: The future of work and power, Heinemann.