Main Article Content
Teachers have been asked to integrate new technologies with didactic education as it happened during COVID-19 times; this has been a real opportunity to review disciplinary and methodological approaches and to enhance features that usually traditional teaching does not use. The learning and the epistemological constructions are promoted also by the use of targeted software that may support the conceptual difficulties in Physics Education through high level of students’ interaction. Our work proved to be quite successful in achieving this support in learning: during the first lockdown period, we proposed a learning unit on the concept of force according to the Newtonian Dynamics using the Desmos software to students in the secondary school. The technological integration is crucial to complete the educational project and it could also be promoted in a non-emergency teaching setting.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
diSessa, A. A. (2004). Principles for computer-based instruction in physics. In E. F. Redish & M. Vicentini (Eds.), Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi”, CLVI (157-174). Amsterdam, NL: IOS Press. doi: 10.3254/1-58603-425-1-157
diSessa, A. A. (2018). A friendly introduction to “knowledge in pieces”: Modeling types of knowledge and their roles in learning. In G. Kaiser et al. (Eds.), Invited Lectures from the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education, ICME-13 Monographs. Charm, CH: SpringerOpen. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-72170-5
Ebert, D. (2015). Graphing projects with Desmos. Mathematics Teacher, 108(5), 388-391. doi: 10.5951/mathteacher.108.5.0388
Etkina, E. (2010). Pedagogical content knowledge and preparation of high school physics teachers. Physical Review Special Topics Physics Education Research, 6(2), 1-26. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020110
Hesse, M. B. (1961). Forces and fields. The concept of action at a distance in the history of physics. Edinburgh, UK: Thomas Nelson and Sons. doi: 10.1086/287897
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Navarra, G. (2019). Il progetto ArAl per un approccio relazionale all’insegnamento nell’area aritmetico-algebrica. Didattica della Matematica. Dalla Ricerca alle Pratiche d’Aula, 5, 70-94. doi: 10.33683/ddm.18.5.3
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi: 10.2307/1175860
Ursini, S. (2011). Il Modello 3UV: uno strumento teorico a disposizione degli insegnanti di matematica. QuaderniCIRD, 2, 59-70. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10077/5132
Vygotsky, L. S. (1934/1987). Thinking and speech. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, 1 (37–285). New York, NY, USA: Plenum.