Teacher personal professional identity and the challenge of digital citizenship: A process-oriented case study in Italian and Irish secondary schools

Main Article Content

Giacomo Zavatta

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between teacher personal professional identity (TpPI) and digital citizenship through an exploratory case study. It aims to provide an in-depth understanding of the impact of digital technologies on the teaching profession by analysing the experiences of 43 secondary school principals and teachers in Ireland and Italy. The empirical research, grounded in the idiographic paradigm, adopts a process-oriented vertical case study approach. Within this framework, a comparative axis is developed to analyse and contrast interview-derived data. The main findings reveal two distinct trajectories of identity development and offer insights into participants’ conceptions of both digital citizenship and the broader digital transformation of education.

Article Details

Section

Articles - General topics

References

Adu, P. (2019). A step-by-step guide to qualitative data coding. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351044516

Bahari, A. (2022). Teacher identity in technology-assisted language learning: Challenges and affordances. E-Learning and Digital Media, 19(4), 396–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530221092855

Bartlett, L., & Vavrus, F. (2017). Rethinking case study research. A comparative approach. Routledge.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.

Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., & Terry, G. (2019). Thematic analysis. In Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences (pp. 843–860). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_103

Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y

Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019

Cappa, C. (2017). Sistemi scolastici d’Europa. Anicia.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research methods in education. Routledge.

Cosgrove, J., Moran, E., Feerick, E., & Duggan, A. (2019). Digital Learning Framework (DLF) national evaluation – starting off: Baseline report. Educational Research Centre.

Craig, C. (2016). Structure of teacher education. In J. Loughran & M. L. Hamilton (Eds.), International handbook of teacher education (pp. 69-135). Springer.

Creswell, J., & Poth, C. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design. Choosing among five approaches. SAGE.

De Kerckhove, D., Di Felice, M., Pireddu, M., Accoto, C., De Miranda, J. B., & Martinez, E J. (2022). Manifesto per la cittadinanza digitale. PAMPAEDIA – Bollettino As.Pe.I. 192 - Gennaio/Giugno 2022, 78-87. https://doi.org/10.7346/aspei-012022-06

Department of Education and Skills (2017). Digital Learning Framework for post-primary schools. Dublin. https://www.dlplanning.ie/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/digital-learning-framework-post-primary.pdf

Engeness, I. (2021). Developing teachers’ digital identity: towards the pedagogic design principles of digital environments to enhance students’ learning in the 21st century. European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(1), 96–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1849129

Eugeni, R. (2022). La condizione post mediale. Media, linguaggi e narrazioni. La scuola.

European Commission (2022). Guidelines for teachers and educators on tackling disinformation and promoting digital literacy through education and training. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/28248

Faiella, F., & Bortolotti, I. (2024). Link & learn. Onlife models, practices and relations. QWERTY (19)2, 5-14. https://doi.org/10.30557/QW000082

Feerick, E., Clerkin, A., & Cosgrove, J. (2022). Teachers’ understanding of the concept of ‘embedding’ digital technology in education. Irish Educational Studies, 41(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.2022521

Feser, M. S., & Haak, I. (2022). Key features of teacher identity: a systematic meta-review study with special focus on teachers of science or science-related subjects. Studies in Science Education, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2022.2108644

Flores, M. A., & Craig, C. J. (2023). Reimagining teacher education in light of the teacher shortage and the aftershock of COVID-19: adjusting to a rapidly shifting world. European Journal of Teacher Education, 46(5), 772–788. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2023.2294697

Floridi, L. (2017). La quarta rivoluzione. Come l’infosfera sta trasformando il mondo. Franco Angeli.

Galvin, C., Gehrmann, A., Madalińska-Michalak, J., Kost, J., Ananin, D., Farrell, R., Germer, P., Bárány, T., Fogarty, L., & Salihovic, M. (2023). Pushing crisis response towards sustainable transformation? Reflections from a case analysis of crisis-framed policy actions on teacher education in three European settings. European Journal of Teacher Education, 46(5), 803–820. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2023.2288811

Goodwin, A. L., Madalińska-Michalak, J., & Flores, M. A. (2023). Rethinking teacher education in/for challenging times: reconciling enduring tensions, imagining new possibilities. European Journal of Teacher Education, 46(5), 840–855. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2023.2299926

Groenewald, E., & Arnold, L. (2024). Teacher professional identity: agentic actions of a novice teacher in a challenging school context. Teachers and Teaching, 31(3), 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2024.2308890

Hanna, F., Oostdam, R., Severiens, S. E., & Zijlstra, B. J. H. (2019). Domains of teacher identity: A review of quantitative measurement instruments. Educational Research Review, 27, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.01.003

Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523

Jandrić, P., Knox, J., Besley, T., Ryberg, T., Suoranta, J., & Hayes, S. (2018). Postdigital science and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(10), 893–899. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1454000

Johnson, C. C., Walton, J. B., Strickler, L., & Elliott, J. B. (2023). Online Teaching in K-12 Education in the United States: A Systematic Review. Review of Educational Research, 93(3), 353–411. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543221105550

Karkazis, P., Leligou, H. C., Trakadas, P., Vretos, N., Asteriadis, S., Daras, P., & Standen, P. (2019). Technologies facilitating smart pedagogy. Didactics of Smart Pedagogy, 433–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01551-0_22

Lin, X. F., Chen, L., Chan, K. K., Peng, S., Chen, X., Xie, S., Liu, J., & Hu, Q. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of teaching sustainable Artificial Intelligence: A design frame perspective. Sustainability, 14(13), 7811. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137811

Liu, X., & Trent, J. (2023). Being a teacher in China: A systematic review of teacher identity in education reform. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(4), 267-293. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.4.15

Lucas, M., Bem-Haja, P., Siddiq, F., Moreira, A., & Redecker, C. (2021). The relation between in-service teachers’ digital competence and personal and contextual factors: What matters most?. Computers & Education, 160, 104052–104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104052

Masoumi, D., & Noroozi, O. (2023). Developing early career teachers’ professional digital competence: a systematic literature review. European Journal of Teacher Education, 1-23 https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2023.2229006

Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. T. (2024). Universal design for learning: principles, framework, and practice: Updated edition of Anne Meyer and David H. Rose's Foundational Text. CAST.

Mincu, M. (2020) Sistemi scolastici nel mondo globale. Educazione comparata e politiche educative. Mondadori.

Mollo, M., Savarese, G., Marsico, G., Pecoraro, N., & Carpinelli, L. (2024). Teaching practices and technologies: transformation of teachers’ agency and professional identity in a changing context. Qwerty. Open and Interdisciplinary Journal of Technology, Culture and Education, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.30557/QW000084

Pagani, V. (2020). Dare voce ai dati: l'analisi dei dati testuali nella ricerca educativa. Junior.

Panciroli, C., & Rivoltella, P. C. (2023). Pedagogia algoritmica. Per una riflessione educativa sull'Intelligenza Artificiale. Scholé-Morcelliana.

Pathiranage, A., & Karunaratne, T. (2023). Teachers’ agency in technology for education in pre-and post-COVID-19 periods: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 13(9), 917. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090917

Persico, D. (2024). Riflessioni su come coltivare l’identità professionale dei docenti. In G. Zavatta (Ed.), L’identità professionale del docente nella società Onlife: democrazia e cittadinanza (pp.388-397). Pensa Multimedia.

Potestio A. (2023). La circolarità non finita della pedagogia. Persona, relazione, «popolo». Studium.

Ranieri, M (2022a). Competenze digitali per insegnare. Modelli e proposte operative. Carocci.

Ranieri, M. (2022b). Le competenze digitali degli insegnanti. In R. Biagioli & S. Oliviero (Eds.), Il Tirocinio Diretto Digitale Integrato (TDDI). Il progetto sperimentale per lo sviluppo delle competenze delle maestre e dei maestri, 49–60. Firenze University Press.

Redecker, C. (2017) European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Punie, Y. (Ed.), Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770

Rushton, E. A. C., Rawlings Smith, E., Steadman, S., & Towers, E. (2023). Understanding teacher identity in teachers’ professional lives: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Education 11(2), e3417 https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3417

Salajan, F., & Jules, T. (2023). Comparative and international education (Re)assembled. Examining a scholarly field through an assemblage theory lens. Bloomsbury.

Saldaña, J., & Omasta, M. (2018). Qualitative research. Analyzing life. Sage.

Suarez, V., & Mcgrath, J. (2022). Teacher professional identity: How to develop and support it in times of change. OECD Education Working Papers, 2022 (267). https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/b19f5af7-en

Trinchero, R. (2004). I metodi della ricerca educativa. Laterza.

Trinchero, R., & Robasto, D. (2019). I Mixed Methods nella Ricerca Educativa. Mondadori.

Ulla, M., Lemana, H., & Kohnke, L. (2024). Unveiling the TikTok teacher: The construction of teacher identity in the digital spotlight. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2024(1) 12, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.845

Zavatta, G. (2024). L’identità professionale del docente nella società onlife: democrazia e cittadinanza. Pensa Multimedia.

Zavatta, G., & Persico, D. (2024). Professionalità docente di fronte alla sfida della cittadinanza digitale. Un’indagine qualitativa tra dirigenti e insegnanti del secondo ciclo di istruzione in Italia e Irlanda. In F. Faiella, I. Bortolotti, & D. Persico (Eds.), Link & Learn. Modelli, pratiche e relazioni onlife (pp.199-216). Pensa Multimedia.