Framing Generative Artificial Intelligence through metaphors: Insights from Italian university students
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigates how Italian university students metaphorically represent Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) and whether such representations show potential associations with gender, age, field of study and prior GAI knowledge. Data were collected through a cross-sectional online survey of 296 students. The analysis followed a hybrid Framework Method, combining inductive development of a category system, deductive application with single-label assignment, and double coding with assessment of intercoder reliability. Bivariate patterns were examined using chi-square tests and evaluated under Benjamini–Hochberg procedure for false discovery rate control (q = 0.05). Results revealed a compact repertoire of metaphor families. Tool/assistant framings predominated, followed by partner/coach and agent/autonomy framings; risk/control and ethics/governance framings were less frequent yet salient. Students’ metaphors highlight available representational resources and pragmatic expectations about GAI, offering insights for Artificial Intelligence (AI) literacy activities focused on understanding, agency, and control. Limitations include explicit elicitation, single-label coding, and the use of a convenience sample. Future research should test multi-label coding schemes and analyse conversational interaction.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Al-Hattami, H. M. (2023). Understanding Perceptions of Academics Toward Technology Acceptance in Accounting Education. Heliyon, 9(1), Article e13141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13141
An, J., Bak, H., Choi, W., Zhang, Y., & Stvilia, B. (2024). College Students’ Metaphors for ChatGPT: An Exploratory Study. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 846–848. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.1116
Aurangzeb, W., Kashan, S., & Rehman, Z. U. (2024). Investigating Technology Perceptions Among Secondary School Teachers: A Systematic Literature Review on Perceived Usefulness and Ease of Use. Academy of Education and Social Sciences Review, 4(2), 160-173. https://doi.org/10.48112/aessr.v4i2.746
Baldwin, M., Landau, M. J., & Swanson, T. J. (2017). Metaphors Can Give Life Meaning. Self and Identity, 17(2), 163-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2017.1368696
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. In D. Marks (Ed.), The Health Psychology Reader (pp. 94-106). Sage Publications.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Macmillan.
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? In M.C. Elish, W. Isaac, R. Zemel, L. Irani, S. Kannan, M. Mitchell, & D. Robinson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 610-623). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
Bullough, R. V. (1991). Exploring Personal Teaching Metaphors in Preservice Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(1), 43-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248719104200107
Davis, F. D. (1986). A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results [Doctoral dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. Mit Libraries DSpace@MIT. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/15192
Demir, K., & Güraksın, G. E. (2022). Determining Middle School Students' Perceptions of the Concept of Artificial Intelligence: A Metaphor Analysis. Participatory Educational Research, 9(2), 297-312. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.41.9.2
Ernungtyas, N. F., & Irwansyah, I. (2018). Factor Analysis of Perceived Mobile Applications Use. KnE Social Sciences, 3(10), 528-541. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i10.2932
Esbrí-Blasco, M. (2024). Metaphorical Conceptualization of AI in Digital Discourse. Methaodos: Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 12(2), Article m241202a07. https://doi.org/10.17502/mrcs.v12i2.824
European Commission. (2021, November 30). Polarisation in Education. Knowledge4Policy. https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/foresight/polarisation-education_en
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., King, T. C., & Taddeo, M. (2021). How to Design AI for Social Good: Seven Essential Factors. In L. Floridi (Ed.), Ethics, Governance, and Policies in Artificial Intelligence (vol. 144, pp 125-151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81907-1_9
Gale, N. K., Heath, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S., & Redwood, S. (2013). Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multidisciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
Giannini, S. (2023). Generative AI and the Future of Education. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385877
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine.
Gök, B., & Erdoğan, T. (2010). Investigation of Pre-Service Teachers' Perceptions About Concept of Technology Through Metaphor Analysis. TOJET: Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(2), 145-160.
Iannella, A., & Pagani, V. (2022). La Scuola Sullo Schermo: Il Contratto Didattico e il Curriculum Nascosto Durante la DaD e la DDI. QTimes- Journal of Education, Technology and Social Studies, XIV(4), 471-486. https://doi.org/10.14668/QTimes_14433
Iannella, A. (2024). The Transitional Space: Generative Artificial Intelligence as an Opportunity for Growth. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/1330
Jackson, S. (2016). Understanding IS/IT Implementation Through Metaphors: A Multi-Metaphor Stakeholder Analysis in an Educational Setting. Computers in Human Behavior, 55(Part B), 1039-1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.039
Karadeniz, Ş. (2012). School Administrators, ICT Coordinators and Teachers’ Metaphorical Conceptualizations of Technology. Education, 2(5), 101-111. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.edu.20120205.01
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
Lawrence, J. E., & Tar, U. A. (2018). Factors That Influence Teachers’ Adoption and Integration of ICT in the Teaching/Learning Process. Educational Media International, 55(1), 79-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1439712
Lim, E. M. (2024). Metaphor Analysis on Pre-Service Early Childhood Teachers’ Conception of AI (Artificial Intelligence) Education for Young Children. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101455
Mannheim, K. (1952). The Problem of Generations. In P. Kecskemeti (Ed.), Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge (pp. 276-320). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1927).
Marcus, G., & Davis, E. (2019). Rebooting AI: Building Artificial Intelligence We Can Trust. Pantheon.
Miao, F., & Shiohira, K. (2024). AI Competency Framework for Students. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/JKJB9835
Mitchell, M. (2024). The Metaphors of Artificial Intelligence. Science, 6723(386), eadt6140. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adt6140
Mollick, E. (2024). Co-Intelligence: Living and Working with AI. Portfolio/Penguin. ISBN 978-0593716717.
Morgan, G. (1980). Paradigms, Metaphors and Puzzle Solving in Organization Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(4), 605-622. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392283
Saban, A., Kocbeker, B. N., & Saban, A. (2007). Prospective Teachers' Conceptions of Teaching and Learning Revealed Through Metaphor Analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17(2), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.003
Savaşkan, V., & Özer, N. (2024). Turkish Language Prospective Teachers’ Perceptions of Metaphors Regarding Artificial Intelligence. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 12(S1June), 180-189. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v12iS1-June.7761
Schmitt, R. (2005). Systematic Metaphor Analysis as a Method of Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 10(2), 358-394. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2005.1854
Tankelevitch, L., Kewenig, V., Simkute, A., Scott, A. E., Sarkar, A., Sellen, A., & Rintel, S. (2024). The Metacognitive Demands and Opportunities of Generative AI. In F.F. Mueller, P. Kyburz, J.R. Williamson, C. Sas, M.L. Wilson, P. Toups Dugas, I. Shklovski (Eds.), CHI '24: Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 680, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642902
Tartuk, M. (2023). Metaphorical Perceptions of Middle School Students Regarding the Concept of Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 11(2), 108-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.11n.2p.108
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Xue, L., Rashid, A. M., & Ouyang, S. (2024). The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Sage Open, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241229570
Yan, Y., Sun, W., & Zhao, X. (2024). Metaphorical Conceptualizations of Generative Artificial Intelligence Use by Chinese University EFL Learners. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1430494. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1430494
Zucker, A. N., Ostrove, J. M., & Stewart, A. J. (2002). College-Educated Women’s Personality Development in Adulthood: Perceptions and Age Differences. Psychology of Aging, 17(2), 236-244.