Gli atteggiamenti degli insegnanti della scuola dell’obbligo nei confronti della robotica educativa
Barra laterale articolo
Pubblicato
feb 21, 2020
Contenuto principale articolo
Abstract
Nonostante il dimostrato potenziale della robotica educativa come strumento didattico per promuovere le competenze disciplinari e trasversali necessarie per la società del XXI secolo, i robot sono ancora sottoutilizzati nelle scuole. Gli atteggiamenti dei docenti nei confronti della robotica educativa giocano un ruolo importante nel far sì che la robotica sia implementata o meno a scuola. Questa ricerca analizza gli atteggiamenti di 174 insegnanti nei confronti della robotica educativa differenziando per regione, sesso, età, ordine scolastico e discipline insegnate. I risultati mostrano che gli insegnanti sono interessati alla robotica educativa e che percepiscono un potenziale nell'uso dei robot per lo sviluppo di competenze trasversali. Alcuni fattori che limitano l'implementazione della robotica a scuola sono i costi, il tempo necessario per preparare le attività e il fatto che le tecnologie sono massicciamente presenti nella nostra vita quotidiana e quindi alcuni insegnanti non vogliono portarle a scuola.
Dettagli articolo
Fascicolo
Sezione
Articoli - Argomenti vari
Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale 4.0 Internazionale.
Gli autori che pubblicano su questa rivista accettano le seguenti condizioni:
- Gli autori mantengono i diritti sulla loro opera e cedono alla rivista il diritto di prima pubblicazione dell'opera, contemporaneamente licenziata sotto una Licenza Creative Common Attribuzione _Non commerciale 4.0 Internazionale.
- Gli autori possono aderire ad altri accordi di licenza non esclusiva per la distribuzione della versione dell'opera pubblicata (es. depositarla in un archivio istituzionale o pubblicarla in una monografia), a patto di indicare che la prima pubblicazione è avvenuta su questa rivista.
- Gli autori possono diffondere la loro opera online (es. in repository istituzionali o nel loro sito web) prima e durante il processo di submission, poiché può portare a scambi produttivi e aumentare le citazioni dell'opera pubblicata (Vedi The effect of Open Access).
Riferimenti bibliografici
Abu-Bader, S. H. (2011). Using statistical methods in social science research: With a complete SPSS guide. Oxford. UK: Oxford University Press.
Alimisis, D. (2009). Teacher education on robotics-enhanced constructivist pedagogical methods. Marousi, GR: Aspete.
Alimisis, D. (2013). Educational robotics: Open questions and new challenges. Themes in Science & Technology Education, 6(1), 63–71.
Ardito, G., Mosley, P., & Scollins, L. (2014). We, robot: Using robotics to promote collaborative and mathematics learning in a middle school classroom. Middle Grades Research Journal, 93(3), 73–88.
Atmatzidou, S., & Demetriadis, S. (2016). Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75(Part B), 661–670. doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2015.10.008
Benitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58(3), 978–1988. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006
Chalmers, C. (2017). Preparing teachers to teach STEM through robotics. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 25(4), 17–31.
Chang, C. W., Lee, J.-H., Chao, P. Y., Wang, C. Y., & Chen, G. D. (2010). Exploring the possibility of using humanoid robots as instructional tools for teaching a second language in primary school. Educational Technology & Society, 13(2), 13–24.
Chevalier, M., Riedo, F., & Mondada, F. (2016). Pedagogical uses of Thymio II: How do teachers perceive educational robots in formal education? IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 23(2), 16–23. doi: 10.1109/MRA.2016.2535080
Chioccariello, A. (2009). Editorial dossier: educational robotics. Tecnologie Didattiche, 17(2), 2-5. doi: 10.17471/2499-4324/305
Chioccariello, A., Manca, S. & Sarti, L. (2002). Editorial. Learning by playing with robots. Tecnologie Didattiche, 10(3), 2-4. doi: 10.17471/2499-4324/497
Eguchi, A. (2014). Robotics as a learning tool for educational transformation. In Proceeding of 4th International Workshop Teaching Robotics, Teaching with Robotics & 5th International Conference Robotics in Education, Jul 2014, Padova, Italy (pp. 27-34). Retrieved from http://www.terecop.eu/TRTWR-RIE2014/files/00_WFr1/00_WFr1_04.pdf
Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39. doi: 10.1007/BF02504683
Fridin, M., & Belokopytov, M. (2014). Acceptance of socially assistive humanoid robot by preschool and primary school teachers. Computer in Human Behavior, 33(4), 23–31. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.016
Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2006). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Education Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252. doi: 10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
Holmquist, S. (2014). A multi-case study of student interactions with educational robots and impact on Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) learning and attitudes. Retrieved from http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/5043/
Keane, T., Chalmers, C., Williams, M., & Boden, M. (2016). The impact of humanoid robots on students' computational thinking. In Proceedings of the Australian Conference on Computers in Education, Oct 2016, Brisbane, Australia (pp. 93-102). Brisbane, AU: Academic Press.
Kim, K. H., Choi, H. S., & Baek, J. E. (2014). A study on the teachers’ perception of school curriculum implementation about robot-based education in Korea concept of robot-based education. Advanced Science and Technology Letters 59, 105–108. doi: 10.14257/astl.2014.59.24
Kim, S.W. & Lee, Y. (2015). A survey on primary school teachers’ attitude toward robot. In Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, Nov. 2015, Kona, Hawaii (pp. 1802-1807). Kona, HI, USA: AACE.
Kradolfer, S., Dubois, S., Riedo, F., Mondada, F., & Fassa, F. (2014). A sociological contribution to understanding the use of robots in schools: the Thymio robot. In M. Beetz, B. Johnston, & M.A. Williams (Eds.) Social Robotics (pp. 217–228). Cham, CH: Springer.
Lawson, T., & Comber, C. (1999). Superhighways technology: Personnel factors leading to successful integration of information and communications technology in schools and colleges. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 8(1), 41–53. doi: 10.1080/14759399900200054
Lee, E., Lee, Y., Kye, B., & Ko, B. (2008). Primary and middle school teachers’, students’ and parents’ perception of robot-aided education in Korea. In Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, June 2008, Vienna, Austria (pp. 175-183). Vienna, A: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Mubin, O., Stevens, C. J., Shahid, S., Mahmud, A.A., & Dong, J. J. (2013). A Review of the applicability of robots in education. Technology for Education and Learning, 1(1), 1–7. doi: 10.2316/Journal.209.2013.1.209-0015
Negrini, L. (2019). Teacher training in educational robotics. An experience in Southern Switzerland: The PReSO project. In W. Lepuschitz, M. Merdan, G. Koppensteiner, R. Balogh, & D. Obdrzalek (Eds.), Robotics in Education: Methods and Applications for Teaching and Learning (pp. 92-97). Berlin, DE: Springer.
Nelson, C. A. (2012). Generating transferable skills in STEM through educational robotics. In B. Barker, G. Nugent, N. Grandgenett & V. Adamchuk (Eds.), Robotics in K-12 Education: A New Technology for Learning (pp. 54–65). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Park, I. W., & Han, J. (2016). Teachers’ views on the use of robots and cloud services in education for sustainable development. Cluster Computing, 19(2), 987–999. doi: 10.1007/s10586-016-0558-9
Reich-Stiebert, N., & Eyssel, F. (2016). Robots in the classroom: What teachers think about teaching and learning with education robots. In A. Agah, J.-J. Cabibihan, A. M. Howard, M. A. Salichs, & H. He (Eds.), Social Robotics (pp. 671–680). Cham, CH: Springer.
Ruona, W. E. A. (2005). Analyzing qualitative data. In R. A. Swanson, & E. F. Holton (Eds.), Research in organizations: Foundations and methods of inquiry (pp. 223–263). San Francisco, CA, USA: Berrett-Koehler.
Sharpe, D. (2015). Your chi-square test is statistically significant: now what? Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 20(8). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=20&n=8
Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0118
World Economic Forum (2016). New vision for education: Fostering social and emotional learning through technology. Geneva, CH: WEF.
Alimisis, D. (2009). Teacher education on robotics-enhanced constructivist pedagogical methods. Marousi, GR: Aspete.
Alimisis, D. (2013). Educational robotics: Open questions and new challenges. Themes in Science & Technology Education, 6(1), 63–71.
Ardito, G., Mosley, P., & Scollins, L. (2014). We, robot: Using robotics to promote collaborative and mathematics learning in a middle school classroom. Middle Grades Research Journal, 93(3), 73–88.
Atmatzidou, S., & Demetriadis, S. (2016). Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75(Part B), 661–670. doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2015.10.008
Benitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58(3), 978–1988. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006
Chalmers, C. (2017). Preparing teachers to teach STEM through robotics. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 25(4), 17–31.
Chang, C. W., Lee, J.-H., Chao, P. Y., Wang, C. Y., & Chen, G. D. (2010). Exploring the possibility of using humanoid robots as instructional tools for teaching a second language in primary school. Educational Technology & Society, 13(2), 13–24.
Chevalier, M., Riedo, F., & Mondada, F. (2016). Pedagogical uses of Thymio II: How do teachers perceive educational robots in formal education? IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 23(2), 16–23. doi: 10.1109/MRA.2016.2535080
Chioccariello, A. (2009). Editorial dossier: educational robotics. Tecnologie Didattiche, 17(2), 2-5. doi: 10.17471/2499-4324/305
Chioccariello, A., Manca, S. & Sarti, L. (2002). Editorial. Learning by playing with robots. Tecnologie Didattiche, 10(3), 2-4. doi: 10.17471/2499-4324/497
Eguchi, A. (2014). Robotics as a learning tool for educational transformation. In Proceeding of 4th International Workshop Teaching Robotics, Teaching with Robotics & 5th International Conference Robotics in Education, Jul 2014, Padova, Italy (pp. 27-34). Retrieved from http://www.terecop.eu/TRTWR-RIE2014/files/00_WFr1/00_WFr1_04.pdf
Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39. doi: 10.1007/BF02504683
Fridin, M., & Belokopytov, M. (2014). Acceptance of socially assistive humanoid robot by preschool and primary school teachers. Computer in Human Behavior, 33(4), 23–31. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.016
Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2006). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Education Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252. doi: 10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
Holmquist, S. (2014). A multi-case study of student interactions with educational robots and impact on Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) learning and attitudes. Retrieved from http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/5043/
Keane, T., Chalmers, C., Williams, M., & Boden, M. (2016). The impact of humanoid robots on students' computational thinking. In Proceedings of the Australian Conference on Computers in Education, Oct 2016, Brisbane, Australia (pp. 93-102). Brisbane, AU: Academic Press.
Kim, K. H., Choi, H. S., & Baek, J. E. (2014). A study on the teachers’ perception of school curriculum implementation about robot-based education in Korea concept of robot-based education. Advanced Science and Technology Letters 59, 105–108. doi: 10.14257/astl.2014.59.24
Kim, S.W. & Lee, Y. (2015). A survey on primary school teachers’ attitude toward robot. In Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, Nov. 2015, Kona, Hawaii (pp. 1802-1807). Kona, HI, USA: AACE.
Kradolfer, S., Dubois, S., Riedo, F., Mondada, F., & Fassa, F. (2014). A sociological contribution to understanding the use of robots in schools: the Thymio robot. In M. Beetz, B. Johnston, & M.A. Williams (Eds.) Social Robotics (pp. 217–228). Cham, CH: Springer.
Lawson, T., & Comber, C. (1999). Superhighways technology: Personnel factors leading to successful integration of information and communications technology in schools and colleges. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 8(1), 41–53. doi: 10.1080/14759399900200054
Lee, E., Lee, Y., Kye, B., & Ko, B. (2008). Primary and middle school teachers’, students’ and parents’ perception of robot-aided education in Korea. In Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, June 2008, Vienna, Austria (pp. 175-183). Vienna, A: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Mubin, O., Stevens, C. J., Shahid, S., Mahmud, A.A., & Dong, J. J. (2013). A Review of the applicability of robots in education. Technology for Education and Learning, 1(1), 1–7. doi: 10.2316/Journal.209.2013.1.209-0015
Negrini, L. (2019). Teacher training in educational robotics. An experience in Southern Switzerland: The PReSO project. In W. Lepuschitz, M. Merdan, G. Koppensteiner, R. Balogh, & D. Obdrzalek (Eds.), Robotics in Education: Methods and Applications for Teaching and Learning (pp. 92-97). Berlin, DE: Springer.
Nelson, C. A. (2012). Generating transferable skills in STEM through educational robotics. In B. Barker, G. Nugent, N. Grandgenett & V. Adamchuk (Eds.), Robotics in K-12 Education: A New Technology for Learning (pp. 54–65). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Park, I. W., & Han, J. (2016). Teachers’ views on the use of robots and cloud services in education for sustainable development. Cluster Computing, 19(2), 987–999. doi: 10.1007/s10586-016-0558-9
Reich-Stiebert, N., & Eyssel, F. (2016). Robots in the classroom: What teachers think about teaching and learning with education robots. In A. Agah, J.-J. Cabibihan, A. M. Howard, M. A. Salichs, & H. He (Eds.), Social Robotics (pp. 671–680). Cham, CH: Springer.
Ruona, W. E. A. (2005). Analyzing qualitative data. In R. A. Swanson, & E. F. Holton (Eds.), Research in organizations: Foundations and methods of inquiry (pp. 223–263). San Francisco, CA, USA: Berrett-Koehler.
Sharpe, D. (2015). Your chi-square test is statistically significant: now what? Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 20(8). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=20&n=8
Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0118
World Economic Forum (2016). New vision for education: Fostering social and emotional learning through technology. Geneva, CH: WEF.