STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION IN EVALUATING BLENDED UNIVERSITY COURSES

Main Article Content

Luciano Cecconi
Katia Sannicandro
Claudia Bellini

Abstract

The spread of blended academic courses generates two needs: on the one hand, to make more explicit what we mean exactly by “mixed teaching”, and on the other, to develop a suitable framework guiding the complex evaluation process of this innovative university teaching mode. Students’ perception has always been one of the most important features to consider whenever teaching is evaluated. The aim of this contribution is to describe methods and results of an investigation carried out with a sample of students enrolled in the four courses that the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (UNIMORE) delivers in blended mode.

Article Details

Section
Articles - Dossier

References

ANVUR (2017). Linee guida per l’accreditamento periodico delle sedi e dei corsi di studio universitari. Retrieved from http://www.anvur.it/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/LG_AVA_10-8-17.pdf

Bowyer, J., & Chambers, L. (2017). Evaluating blended learning: Bringing the elements together. Research Matters: A Cambridge Assessment Publication, 23, 17-26. Retrieved from https://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/Images/375446-evaluating-blended-learning-bringing-the-elements-together.pdf

Calderon, O., Ginsberg, A. P., & Ciabocchi, L. (2012). Multidimensional Assessment of Pilot Blended Learning Programs: Maximizing Program Effectiveness Based on Student and Faculty Feedback. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(4), 23-37. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ982679

Chandra, V., & Fisher, D. L. (2009). Students’ perceptions of a blended web-based learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 12(1), 31–44. doi: 10.1007/s10984-008-9051-6

Chang, V. (1999). Evaluating the effectiveness of online learning using a new web based learning instrument. Proceedings Western Australian Institute for Educational Research Forum 1999. Retrieved from http://www.waier.org.au/forums/1999/chang.html

Chang, V., & Fisher, D. L. (2003). The validation and application of a new learning environment instrument for online learning in higher education. In M. S. Khine & D. L. Fisher (Eds.), Technology-rich learning environments: A future perspective (pp. 1–20). Singapore, SG: World Scientific publishing Co. pte. Ltd.

Donnelly, R. (2006). Blended problem-based learning for teacher education: Lessons learnt. Learning, Media and Technology, 31(2), 93-116. doi: 10.1080/17439880600756621

Ellis, R. A., Pardo, A., & Han, F. (2016). Quality in blended learning environments - Significant differences in how students approach learning collaborations. Computers & Education, 102, 90-102. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.07.006

Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N.D. (2008). Blearning in higher education - Framework, principles and guidelines. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass.

Graham, C. R. (2004). Blended Learning Systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3-21). San Francisco, CA, USA: Pfeiffer.

Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. G. Morre (Ed.), Handbook of Distance Education (pp. 333-350). New York, NY, USA: Routledge.

Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2012). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 4–14. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.003

MIUR (2016). Decreto Ministeriale n. 635, 8/8/2016.

MIUR (2019). Decreto Ministeriale n. 6, 7/1/2019.

Moore, J. C. (2005). The Sloan Consortium Quality Framework and the Five Pillars, Retrieved from http://www.mit.jyu.fi/OPE/kurssit/TIES462/Materiaalit/Sloan.pdf

Ozkan, S., & Koseler, R. (2009). Multi-dimensional students’ evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1285–1296. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.011

Pombo, L., & Moreira, A. (2012). Evaluation framework for blended learning courses: A puzzle piece for the evaluation process. Contemporary Educational Technology, 3(3), 201-211. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/cet/issue/25729/271463

Quagliata, A. (2008). Competenze per lo sviluppo delle risorse umane. Esperienze di formazione blended. Roma, IT: Armando Editore.

Sannicandro, K., De Santis, A., Fazlagic, B., Bellini, C., Tedeschi, C., & Minerva, T. (2018). Attivazione, erogazione e monitoraggio dei corsi di laurea blended dell’Università degli studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia. In A. Volungeviciene & A. Szűcs (Eds.), Exploring the Micro, Meso e Macro. Navigating between dimensions in the digital learning landscape. EDEN 2018 Annual Conference, Genoa, Italy 17-20 June 2018 (pp. 834-42). Budapest, HU: European Distance and E-Learning Network.

Smythe, M. (2011). Blended learning: A transformative process? Paper presented at National Tertiary Learning & Teaching Conference 2011. Nelson, New Zealand, 12-14 October 2011. Retrieved from https://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/community/national-teaching-andlearning-conference-2010/resources/files/smythe-blended-learning-transformativeprocess

Spring, K. J., & Graham, C. R. (2017). Thematic patterns in international blended learning literature, research, practices, and terminology. Online Learning, 21(4), 337- 361. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/183777/

UNIMORE (2016). Carta dei servizi. Corso di laurea in Scienze e Tecniche Psicologiche in modalità blended. Retrieved from http://www.des.unimore.it/site/home/didattica/scienze-e-tecniche-psicologiche.html