Learning design research: where are we going?
Article Sidebar
Published
Apr 30, 2013
Main Article Content
Abstract
Considerations on the way ahead for learning design research, particularly concerning the links with students’ self-regulated learning and teachers’ digital competence.
Article Details
Section
Column "Opinion pieces"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
References
Bauer J., Kenton J. (2005). Toward technology integration in the schools: Why it isn’t happening. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13 (4), pp. 519-546.
Conole G. (2012). Designing for learning in an Open World. New York, USA: Springer.
Cuban L., Kirkpatrick H., Peck C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38 (4), pp. 813-834.
Koper R. (2006). Current research in learning design. Educational Technology & Society, 9 (1), pp. 13-22.
Mor Y., Craft B. (2012). Learning design: reflections upon the current landscape. Research in Learning Technology. Supplement ALT-C 2012 Conference Proceedings, http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/ index.php/rlt/article/view/19196/html (ultima consultazione 03.12.2012)
Olimpo G., Bottino R.M., Earp J., Ott M., Pozzi F., Tavella M. (2010). Pedagogical plans as communication oriented objects. Computers & Education, 55, pp. 476-488.
Persico D. (2006). Media selection from the teacher’s point of view. In A. Cartelli (ed.). Teaching in the Knowledge Society: New Skills and Instruments for Teachers. Hershey, PA USA: Information Science Publishing, pp. 286- 301.
Reiser R.A. (2001) A history of Instructional Design and Technology: Part II: A history of Instructional Design. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 49 (2), pp. 57-67.
Conole G. (2012). Designing for learning in an Open World. New York, USA: Springer.
Cuban L., Kirkpatrick H., Peck C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38 (4), pp. 813-834.
Koper R. (2006). Current research in learning design. Educational Technology & Society, 9 (1), pp. 13-22.
Mor Y., Craft B. (2012). Learning design: reflections upon the current landscape. Research in Learning Technology. Supplement ALT-C 2012 Conference Proceedings, http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/ index.php/rlt/article/view/19196/html (ultima consultazione 03.12.2012)
Olimpo G., Bottino R.M., Earp J., Ott M., Pozzi F., Tavella M. (2010). Pedagogical plans as communication oriented objects. Computers & Education, 55, pp. 476-488.
Persico D. (2006). Media selection from the teacher’s point of view. In A. Cartelli (ed.). Teaching in the Knowledge Society: New Skills and Instruments for Teachers. Hershey, PA USA: Information Science Publishing, pp. 286- 301.
Reiser R.A. (2001) A history of Instructional Design and Technology: Part II: A history of Instructional Design. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 49 (2), pp. 57-67.