Analysis of follow-up training

Article Sidebar

PDF (Italian)
Published: Jan 1, 2007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/365
Keywords:
Educational Technology, Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL), Procopius, Information and Communication Technology (ICT),

Main Article Content

Guglielmo Trentin
Istituto per le Tecnologie Didattiche - CNR | Genova
Elisabetta Vallarino
Istituto per le Tecnologie Didattiche - CNR | Genova

Abstract

Description of a methodology for the analysis of follow-up training. Is presented a possible detection tool used in the project Procopius on collaborative network involving a group of teachers in South Tyrol.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 15 No. 2 (2007): TD41 - Argomenti Vari
Section
Articles - Special Issue

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 Attribution 4.0 International License.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)

References

Baddeley A. (1990), Human memory: Theory and practice, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Belli R. (1998), The structure of autobiographical memory and the event history calendar: Potential improvements in the quality of retrospective reports in surveys, Memory, 6, pp. 383-406.

Belson W.A. (1981), The design and understanding of survey questions, Aldershot, Gower.

Bollen K.A., Lenox, R. (1991), Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective, Psychological Bulletin, 110, pp. 305-14.

Cannel C.F., Fisher, G., Bakker, T. (1965), Reporting on hospitalization in the Health Interview Survey. Vital and Health Statistics (PHS Publication No. 1000, Series 2, No. 6), US Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.

Conrad F.G., Brown, N.R. (1996), Estimating frequency: A multiple strategy perspective. In Herrmann, M., Johnson, C., McEvoy, C., Hertzog, C., Hertel, P. (Eds), Basic and applied memory: Research on practical aspects of memory, vol. 2 (pp. 167-178), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

Cronbach L.J. (1951), Coefficient Alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrik, XVI, pp. 297-334.

DeMaio T. J. (1984), Social desirability and survey measurement: A review. In Turner C.F., Martin E. (Eds.), Surveying subjective phenomena, vol. 2 Russell Sage, New York, pp. 257-281.

Dillon C.L., Hengst H.R., Zoller D. (1991), Instructional strategies and student involvement in Distance Education: a study of the Oklahoma Televised Instruction System. Journal of Distance Education/Revue de l’enseignement à distance, 6(1), pp.28-41.

Formica S.W., Harding W.M., Giguere P.J. (2003), Evaluating Results from Distance Learning Courses for U.S. Department of Education Middle School Coordinators. Consultabile alla pagina: http://hhd.org/documents/MS C_document_4.pdf

Frary R.B. (1996), Brief guide to questionnaire development. ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation, Washington, DC.

Gellner E.A. (1964), Concept. In Gould, J., Kolb, W.L. (Eds.), A Dictionary of the Social Sciences. Free Press, Glencoe.

Gerstlé J. (1989), Concepts, théories et programmes de recherche. Revue Internationale des Sciences Sociales, 122, pp. 673-681.

Goode W.J, Hatt P.K. (1952), Methods in Social Research. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Grant M.M. (2004), Learning to teach with the web: factors influencing teacher education faculty. The Internet and Higher Education, 7, pp. 329-341.

Harrison P.J, Seeman B.J., Behm R., Saba F., Molise G., Williams M.D. (1991), Development of a Distance Education Assessment Instrument. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(4), pp. 65-77.

Kahn R.L., Cannel C. (1957), The dynamics of interviewing. Wiley, New York.

Kirkpatrick D.L. (1998), Evaluating training programs. Berret- Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, CA.

Johnston J., Barker L.T. (2002), Assessing the impact of technology in teaching and learning: a sourcebook for evaluators. Consultabile alla pagina: http://www.rcgd.isr.umich.edu /tlt/TechSbk.pdf

Lan J. (2001), Web-based instruction for education faculty: A needs assessment. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), pp. 385-399.

Lazarsfeld P.F. (1958), Evidence and Inference in Social Research, Daedalus, LXXXVII, 3, pp. 99-130.

Morgan D.L. (1988), Focus group as Qualitative Research. Sage, Newbury Park.

Morgan D.L. (1993), Successful focus group, Sage, London.

Pearson E. S. (1938), Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis (2nd ed.), Duxbury, Belmont, CA.

Rossi P.H., Freeman H.E., Lipsey M.W. (2004), Evaluation: A Systematic Approach, 7th edition. Sage Publications, California.

Schuman H., Presser S. (1981), Questions and answers in attitude survey, Academic Press, New York.

Schwarz N. (1996), Cognition and communication: Judgmental biases, research methods, and the logic of conversation. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

Schwarz N., Hipper H.J. (1991), Response alternatives: The impact of their choice and ordering. In Biemer P., Groves R., Mathiowetz N., Sudman S. (Eds.), Measurement error in surveys, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 41-56.

Schwarz N., Oyserman D. (2001), Asking questions about behaviour: cognition, communication, and questionnaire construction. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, pp. 127-60.

Templeton J.F. (1994), The focus group. Probus Publishing company, Chicago.

Trentin G. (2000), The qualityinteractivity relationship in Distance Education. Educational Technology, 40(1), pp. 17-27.

Welle-Strand A., & Thune T. (2003), E-learning policies, practices and challenges in two Norwegian organizations. Evaluation and program planning, 26, pp. 185-192.

Willen B. (1981), Distance education at Swedish universities: an evaluation of the experimental programme and a follow-up study. Uppsala Studies in Education, Uppsala University, Stockholm.