Apprendimento collaborativo online per promuovere il pensiero valutativo negli insegnanti
Barra laterale dell'articolo
Contenuto principale dell'articolo
Abstract
Lo studio si concentra su come rafforzare la capacità valutativa dei docenti in una dimensione sociale e collaborativa. All’interno di un programma istituzionale di sviluppo professionale docente tramite LMS, è stata testata l’introduzione di forme di apprendimento collaborativo. Infatti, l’apprendimento collaborativo supportato dal computer (CSCL) risulta appropriato quando si vogliano sollecitare capacità di tipo riflessivo tramite il confronto tra pari. L’articolo esamina il programma di formazione Valu.Elearn, rivolto agli insegnanti in servizio per rafforzare le proprie competenze in ambito valutativo. Lo studio si concentra su due e-tivity di tipo collaborativo, che hanno coinvolto complessivamente 166 docenti e due tutor nell’anno scolastico 2021-22. Il Community of Inquiry è stato utilizzato come quadro di riferimento per l’analisi del contenuto dei forum, mentre le interazioni tra i partecipanti sono state esaminate attraverso l’analisi socioculturale del discorso. I risultati evidenziano opportunità e limiti della collaborazione online per la promozione di una riflessione condivisa sui temi valutativi.
Dettagli dell'articolo
Questo volume è pubblicato con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.
Gli autori che pubblicano su questa rivista accettano le seguenti condizioni:
- Gli autori mantengono i diritti sulla loro opera e cedono alla rivista il diritto di prima pubblicazione dell'opera, contemporaneamente licenziata sotto una Licenza Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Gli autori possono aderire ad altri accordi di licenza non esclusiva per la distribuzione della versione dell'opera pubblicata (es. depositarla in un archivio istituzionale o pubblicarla in una monografia), a patto di indicare che la prima pubblicazione è avvenuta su questa rivista.
- Gli autori possono diffondere la loro opera online (es. in repository istituzionali o nel loro sito web) prima e durante il processo di submission, poiché può portare a scambi produttivi e aumentare le citazioni dell'opera pubblicata (Vedi The effect of Open Access).
Riferimenti bibliografici
Anderson, T., L. Rourke, D.R. Garrison, & W. Archer (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875
Annand, D. (2019). Limitations of the Community of Inquiry Framework. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 34(2), 1-15.
Baker, M.J., Schwarz, B.B., & Ludvigsen, S.R. (2021). Educational dialogues and computer supported collaborative learning: critical analysis and research perspectives. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 16, 583–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-021-09359-1
Barzanò, G. (2002). School Self-evaluation Towards a European Dimension. European Journal of Teacher Education, 25(1), 83-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/0261976022000012886
Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2011). Index for Inclusion: Developing Learning and Participation in Schools. Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Structure and Spontaneity: Knowledge and organization. in Nonaka, I. & Teece, D. J. (Eds.) Managing Industrial Knowledge. Creation, Transfer and Utilization (pp. 44-67). Sage Publications.
Brown, C., & Malin, J. (Eds.) (2022). The Emerald Handbook of Evidence Informed Practice in Education. Learning from International Contexts. Emerald Publishing Limited.
Brown, C., Poortman, C., Gray, H., Ophoff, J. G., & Wharf., M. M. (2021). Facilitating Collaborative Reflective Inquiry Amongst Teachers: What Do We Currently Know? International Journal of Educational Research, 105, Article 101695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101695
Calvani, A., Fini, A., Molino, M., & Ranieri, M. (2010). Visualizing and monitoring effective interactions in online collaborative groups. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 213-226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00911.x
Chapman, C., & Sammons, P. (2013). School Self-Evaluation for School Improvement: What Works and Why? CfBT Education Trust.
Chapman, C. (2018). School-to-school collaboration: Building collective capacity through collaborative enquiry. In Eddy-Spicer, D. H., Connolly, M., S. D., & James, C. (Eds.) The SAGE handbook of school organization (pp. 540-561). Sage.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Heath.
Dille, K. B., & Røkenes, F. M. (2021). Teachers’ professional development in formal online communities: A scoping review. Teaching and teacher education, 105, 103431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103431
European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice (2015). Assuring Quality in Education: Policies and Approaches to School Evaluation in Europe. Eurydice Report. Publications Office of the European Union.
Fu, E.L.F., van Aalst, J., & Chan, C.K.K. (2016). Toward a classification of discourse patterns in asynchronous online discussions. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11, 441-478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9245-3
Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Garrison, D. R. (2007). Online Community of Inquiry Review: Social, Cognitive, and Teaching Presence Issues. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v11i1.1737
Garrison, D. R. (2009). Communities of Inquiry in Online Learning. In P. Rogers, G. Berg, J. Boettcher, C. Howard, L. Justice, & K. Schenk (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Distance Learning, Second Edition (pp. 352-355). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-198-8.ch052
Giampietro, L., Pillera, G. C., & Poliandri, D. (2023). Pratiche di apprendimento collaborativo tra scuole: peer review e visiting a supporto dell’autovalutazione delle scuole. Annali online della Didattica e della Formazione Docente, 15(26), 206-225. https://doi.org/10.15160/2038-1034/2768
Godfrey, D., & Brown, C. (2019). Innovative models that bridge the research–practice divide: Research learning communities and research-informed peer review. In An ecosystem for research-engaged schools (pp. 91-107). Routledge.
Godfrey, D. (2020). From peer review to collaborative peer enquiry: Action research for school improvement and leadership development. London Review of Education, 18(3), 373–89. https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.18.3.04
Haythornthwaite, C. (2009). Crowds, and Communities: Light and Heavyweight Models of Peer Production. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, HI, USA, 2009 (pp. 1-10). doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2009.137
Johnson, M., & Mercer, N. (2019). Using sociocultural discourse analysis to analyse professional discourse. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 267-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.04.003
Kaczkó, É. Ostendorf, A. (2023). Critical thinking in the community of inquiry framework: An analysis of the theoretical model and cognitive presence coding schemes. Computers & Education, 193, 104662, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104662
Khodabandelou, R., Vahdani Asadi, M. R., Ghasemi, M., & Amerian, M. (2024). More than two decades of community of inquiry research: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis. E-Learning and Digital Media, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530241239418
Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts: A conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18(2), 159-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9007-2
Kippers, W. B., Poortman, C. L., Schildkamp, K., & Visscher, A. J. (2018). Data literacy: What do educators learn and struggle with during a data use intervention? Studies in educational evaluation, 56, 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.11.001
Krippendorf, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Sage.
Lai, M. K., & McNaughton, S. (2013). Analysis and discussion of classroom and achievement data to raise student achievement. In Schildkamp, K., Lai, M.K., & Earl, L. (Eds.), Data-based decision making in education: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 23-47). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4816-3_3
Lantz-Andersson, A., Lundin, M., & Selwyn, N. (2018). Twenty years of online teacher communities: A systematic review of formally-organized and informally-developed professional learning groups. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 75(1), 302-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.07.008
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.
Lincon, Y.S., Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Littleton, K., & Mercer, N. (2013). Interthinking: Putting Talk to Work. Routledge.
Ludvigsen, S., & Mørch, A. (2010). Computer-supported collaborative learning: Basic concepts, multiple perspectives, and emerging trends. The international Encyclopedia of Education, 5, 290-296.
MacBeath, J. (1999). Schools must speak for themselves. The case for school self-evaluation. Routledge.
Mandinach, E.B, & Gummer, E.S. (2016). What does it mean for teachers to be data literate: Laying out the skills, knowledge, and dispositions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 366-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.011
McNamara, G., & O’Hara, J. (2008). The importance of the concept of self-evaluation in the changing landscape of education policy. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 34(3), 173-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2008.08.001
McNamara, G., Skerritt, C., O’Hara, J., O’Brien, S., & Brown, M. (2022). For improvement, accountability, or the economy? Reflecting on the purpose (s) of school self-evaluation in Ireland. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 54(2), 158-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2021.1985439
Mentini, L., & Levatino, A. (2024). A “three-legged model”: (De) constructing school autonomy, accountability, and innovation in the Italian National Evaluation System. European Educational Research Journal, 23(3), 321-346. https://doi.org/10.1177/147490412211482
Mercer, N. (2000). Words & Minds: How We Use Language to Think Together. Routledge.
Mercer, N. (2004). Sociocultural discourse analysis: analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 137-168. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v1.i2.137
O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
Poliandri D., Perazzolo M., Pillera, G. C., & Giampietro, L. (2022). Un’opportunità di formazione sull’autovalutazione delle scuole. Annali online della didattica e della formazione docente, 14(23), 169 - 184. https://doi.org/10.15160/2038-1034/2413
Poliandri D., Perazzolo M., Pillera, G. C., & Giampietro, L. (2023) Dematerialized participation challenges: Methods and practices for online focus groups. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, Article 1145264. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1145264
Romiti, S., Fabbro, F., & Mattarelli, E. (2023a). Valu.Elearn. Un programma di formazione online per accrescere la competenza valutativa del personale scolastico. Lifelong Lifewide Learning, 19(42), 135-145. https://doi.org/10.19241/lll.v19i42.725
Romiti, S., Fabbro, F., & Mattarelli, E. (2023b). Collective feedback as a formative assessment practice in an e-learning platform for teachers’ professional development. Q-Times Webmagazine, 2(1), 563-576. doi: 10.14668/QTimes_15176
Ryan, K. E., Chandler, M., & Samuels, M. (2007). What should school-based evaluation look like? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33(3-4), 197-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2007.07.001
Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of Problem-based Learning: Definitions and Distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9-20. :https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002
Sannicandro, K., Santis, A. D., Bellini, C., & Minerva, T. (2019). Analysis of completion and dropout rates in EduOpen MOOCs. Italian Journal of Educational Research, 12, 27–42. https://dx.doi.org/10.7346/SIRD-2S2019-P27
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2014). Knowledge building and knowledge creation: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 397–417). Cambridge University Press.
Scheerens, J., Glas, C., & Thomas, S.M. (2003). Educational Evaluation, Assessment, and Monitoring. A Systemic approach. Swetz & Zeitlinger Publishers.
Schildkamp, K., Poortman, C.L., Ebbeler, J., & Pieters, J.M. (2019). How school leaders can build effective data teams: Five building blocks for a new wave of data-informed decision making. Journal of Educational Change, 20, 283–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09345-3
van Aalst, J. (2009). Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 259–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9069-5
van der Scheer, E. A., Glas, C. A., & Visscher, A. J. (2017). Changes in teachers’ instructional skills during an intensive data-based decision making intervention. Teaching and teacher education, 65, 171-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.018
Wise, A.F., & Schwarz, B.B. (2017). Visions of CSCL: eight provocations for the future of the field. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 12, 423–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9267-5
Young, C., McNamara, G., Brown, M., & O’Hara, J. (2018). Adopting and adapting: school leaders in the age of data-informed decision making. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 30, 133–158 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-018-9278-4