Valutare gli ambienti digitali immersivi mediante i principi della multimedialità di Mayers
Barra laterale dell'articolo
Contenuto principale dell'articolo
Abstract
Negli ultimi anni, l’integrazione delle tecnologie digitali nella didattica ha favorito lo sviluppo di ambienti di apprendimento immersivi e interattivi. Questo studio analizza i prodotti digitali realizzati dagli studenti del corso di Tecnologie dell’istruzione e dell’apprendimento presso l’Università di Torino valutandoli secondo i principi della multimedialità di Mayer. L’analisi ha evidenziato un ampio rispetto dei principi di segmentazione, contiguità spaziale e interattività, mentre la personalizzazione e la coerenza presentano margini di miglioramento. Le correlazioni tra variabili indicano che un’adeguata progettazione visiva e strutturale migliora l’esperienza didattica, riducendo la ridondanza e il sovraccarico cognitivo. I risultati suggeriscono che un equilibrio tra multimedialità, interattività e segmentazione è essenziale per garantire un apprendimento efficace. Le implicazioni didattiche evidenziano la necessità di una progettazione pedagogicamente solida per massimizzare il potenziale delle nuove tecnologie educative.
Dettagli dell'articolo
Fascicolo
Sezione
Questo volume è pubblicato con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.
Gli autori che pubblicano su questa rivista accettano le seguenti condizioni:
- Gli autori mantengono i diritti sulla loro opera e cedono alla rivista il diritto di prima pubblicazione dell'opera, contemporaneamente licenziata sotto una Licenza Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Gli autori possono aderire ad altri accordi di licenza non esclusiva per la distribuzione della versione dell'opera pubblicata (es. depositarla in un archivio istituzionale o pubblicarla in una monografia), a patto di indicare che la prima pubblicazione è avvenuta su questa rivista.
- Gli autori possono diffondere la loro opera online (es. in repository istituzionali o nel loro sito web) prima e durante il processo di submission, poiché può portare a scambi produttivi e aumentare le citazioni dell'opera pubblicata (Vedi The effect of Open Access).
Riferimenti bibliografici
Abdinejad, M., Talaie, B., Qorbani, H. S., & Dalili, S. (2021). Student perceptions using augmented reality and 3D visualization technologies in chemistry education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(1), 87–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09880-2
Bonaiuti, G. (2017). Le tecnologie educative: criteri per una scelta basata su evidenze. Roma: Carocci.
Bruschi, B. (2021). Ambienti di apprendimento integrati e digitali per una didattica aumentata. BRICKS, 6, 176–182.
Çeken, B., Taşkın, N. Multimedia learning principles in different learning environments: a systematic review. Smart Learn. Environ. 9, 19 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00200-2
Criollo-C, S., Guerrero-Arias, A., Jaramillo-Alcázar, Á., & Luján-Mora, S. (2021). Mobile Learning Technologies for Education: Benefits and Pending Issues. Applied Sciences, 11(9), 4111. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094111
Familoni, B. T., & Onyebuchi, N. C. (2024). Augmented and virtual reality in us education: a review: analyzing the impact, effectiveness, and future prospects of ar/vr tools in enhancing learning experiences. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6(4), 642-663. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i4.1043
Garzón, J. (2021). An Overview of Twenty-Five Years of Augmented Reality in Education. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 5(7), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti5070037
Geana, M. V., Cernusca, D., & Liu, P. (2024). Beyond the dawn of virtualized learning environments: A comparative study of video and augmented reality information delivery on student engagement and knowledge retention. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(2), 394–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12890
Gómez-Rios, M. D., Paredes-Velasco, M., Hernández-Beleño, R. D., & Fuentes-Pinargote, J. A. (2022). Analysis of emotions in the use of augmented reality technologies in education: A systematic review. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 31(1), 216-234. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22593
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
Hidayat, R., & Wardat, Y. (2024). A systematic review of augmented reality in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(8), 9257–9282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12157-x
Ibáñez, M. B., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002
Kao, M. C., Yuan, Y. H., & Wang, Y. X. (2023). The study on designed gamified mobile learning model to assess students' learning outcome of accounting education. Heliyon, 9(2), e13409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13409
Khaldi, A., Bouzidi, R. & Nader, F. Gamification of e-learning in higher education: a systematic literature review. Smart Learning Environments, 10 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00227-z
Küçük Avcı, Ş., Çoklar, A., & İstanbullu, A. (2019). The Effect of Three Dimensional Virtual Environments and Augmented Reality Applications on The Learning Achievement: A Meta-Analysis Study. Education and Science, 44(198), 149-182. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2019.7969
Lisana, L., & Suciadi, M. F. (2021). The Acceptance of Mobile Learning: A Case Study of 3D Simulation Android App for Learning Physics. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 15(17), pp. 205–214. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i17.23731
Mayer, R. E. (2005). Principles of Multimedia Learning Based on Social Cues : Personalization, Voice, and Image Principles. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 201–212). chapter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816819.014
Mayer, R.E. The Past, Present, and Future of the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. Educ Psychol Rev 36, 8 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1
Moro, C., Birt, J., Stromberga, Z., Phelps, C., Clark, J., Glasziou, P., & Scott, A. M. (2021). Virtual and Augmented Reality Enhancements to Medical and Science Student Physiology and Anatomy Test Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Anatomical Sciences Education, 14(3), 368–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2049
Özdemir, O., & Dag, K. (2022). A meta-analysis on using 3D virtual worlds in foreign language education. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 14(4), 908–921. https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2022.04.002
Pellas, N., Kazanidis, I., Konstantinou, N., & Georgiou, G. (2017). Exploring the educational potential of three-dimensional multi-user virtual worlds for STEM education: A mixed-method systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 22, 2235–2279. https://doi.org/100.1007/s10639-016-9537-2
Qosimov, J. A., Muhitdinov, A. B., Muhitdinov, A. A., Igamberdiev, D. K., & Abbazov, B. T. (2022, June). The role of software in the development of modeling in education. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2432, No. 1). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0090472
Roffi, A., & Cuomo, S. (2022). STEM teaching and learning with innovative technologies in the upper secondary school: A scoping review. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1): 77-88. doi: 10.17471/24994324/1291
Roopa, D., Prabha, R., & Senthil, G. A. (2021). Revolutionizing education system with interactive augmented reality for quality education. Materials Today: Proceedings, 46, 3860-3863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.294
Sansone, N., & Ritella, G. (2020). Formazione insegnanti “aumentata”: integrazione di metodologie e tecnologie al servizio di una didattica socio-costruttivista. Qwerty, 15(1), 70-88. https://doi.org/10.30557/QW000023
Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory: Recent theoretical advances. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno, & R. Brünken (Eds.), Cognitive load theory (pp. 29–47). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844744.004
Szymkowiak, A., Melović, B., Dabić, M., Jeganathan, K., & Kundi, G. S. (2021). Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the education of young people. Technology in Society, 65, 101565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101565
Tzima, S., Styliaras, G., & Bassounas, A. (2019). Augmented reality applications in education: Teachers' point of view. Education Sciences, 9(2), 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020099
Yamazaki, M., Takayama, T., Fujita, A., Kikuchi, T., Kamimura, T., Myoga, H., Mayumi, S., Yazaki, K., Katano, S., Komatsubara, M., Kamei, J., Sugihara, T., Ando, S., & Fujimura, T. (2023). 3D printed kidney model could be an important educational tool for residents. Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery, 16(2), 197–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.13136
Yammine, K., & Violato, C. (2016). The effectiveness of physical models in teaching anatomy: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Advances in Health Sciences Education : Theory and Practice, 21(4), 883–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9644-7
Yousef, A. M. F. (2021). Augmented reality assisted learning achievement, motivation, and creativity for children of low-grade in primary school. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(4), 966–977. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12536
Zeybek, N., & Saygı, E. (2023). Gamification in Education: Why, Where, When, and How? A Systematic Review. Games and Culture, 19(2), 237-264. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120231158625