CHILDREN’S USE OF IPADS TO DOCUMENT THEIR OWN VISIBLE LEARNING

Main Article Content

Nelisiwe Phakathi
Ian Moll

Abstract

This ethnographic study explores the use of iPads in the documentation of visible learning by children in a Reggio Emilia-inspired classroom. We report and draw on research conducted with nine- to ten-year olds in a Grade 3 class in the school, situated in Johannesburg, South Africa. “Visible learning” is a key theoretical concept in the Reggio Emilia approach to early childhood education. It envisages a collaborative pedagogy in which children, along with their teachers and parents, document and reflect on their own learning as it happens, thus maximizing its internalization by the children. The study investigates the affordances of iPads in actualizing the documentation of visible learning. The results show that iPads afford young learners with complex ways in which they can document their learning, also ensuring that the technology does not impose itself on them in an artificial manner. The article identifies an emerging language of description of the pedagogical affordances of iPads.

Article Details

Section
Articles - Dossier
Author Biographies

Nelisiwe Phakathi, Beaulieu Preparatory School, Midrand, South Africa

Nelisiwe Phakathi is a primary school teacher who specialises in second languages and e-learning. She is currently embarking on PhD studies in Educational Technology at the University of the Witwatersrand, from which she holds a Master of Education degree. Her interests include App development, particularly in additional language acquisition and visible thinking. She has been involved with the Africa Reggio Emilia Alliance where she has worked as a workshop facilitator on a part time basis. This role has afforded her the opportunity to work with other professionals who are interested in developing more effective teaching methods. She also translated and edited a resource booklet, ‘Reimagine Education: Reggio Emilia inspiration in Africa’, from English into the isiZulu language.

 

Ian Moll, School of Education, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Ian Moll is research fellow at REAL (Centre for Researching Education and Labour) at the University of the Witwatersrand, having been retired from the Division of Educational Information and Engineering Technology at the end of 2021. His interests lie in learning and pedagogy, the network society, and educational technology. His PhD is in cognitive science and education from the University of Geneva. During his career, he has been a junior primary teacher, a trade unionist, a District Director in the Gauteng Department of Education, a researcher at the South African Institute for Distance Education, and visiting professor at the Universities of Makarere and Witwatersrand (where he was lead researcher in the Panafrican Agenda on the Pedagogic Integration of ICTs). His latest publications are: ‘Debunking the myth of the fourth industrial revolution’ (REAL Occasional Paper, 2022) and a poetry collection, ‘Bedtime (and wake-up) poems for the Davos 2022 season’ (Daily Maverick, 15 May 2022).

References

Agostini, A., & Di Biase, E. (2012). Large multitouch screens to enhance collaboration in the classroom of the 21st century: an Italian experiment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15, 40–56.

Alyahya, S., & Gall, J.E. (2012). iPads in education: A qualitative study of students’ attitudes and experiences. In T. Amiel & B. Wilson (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2012 – World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 1266-1271). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/40913/

Barreiro, J. (2020). Rethinking causality through children’s literacy. In K. Toohey, S. Smythe, D. Dagenais & M. Forte (Eds.), Transforming language and literacy education. (pp. 91-103). Milton Park, UK: Routledge.

Bath, C. (2012). ‘I can’t read it; I don’t know’: Young children’s participation in the pedagogical documentation of English early childhood education and care settings. International Journal of Early Years Education, 20(2), 190–201. doi:10.1080/09669760.2012.715242

Battro, A. (2004). Digital skills, globalization, and education. In M. Suarez-Orozco & D.B. Qin- Hilliard, (Eds.), Globalization, culture and education in the new millennium (pp. 78-96). Berkeley, CA, US: University of California Press.

Brand, J., & Kinash, S. (2010). Pad-agogy: A quasi-experimental and ethnographic pilot test of the iPad in a blended mobile learning environment. Paper presented at the 27th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE). Sydney, Australia. Retrieved from https://epublications.bond.edu.au

Brown, C., & Czerniewicz, L. (2010). Debunking the 'digital native': beyond digital apartheid, towards digital democracy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 357-369. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00369.x

Bygstad, B., Munkvold, B.E., & Volkoff, O. (2016). Identifying generative mechanisms through affordances: A framework for critical realist data analysis. Journal of Information Technology, 31, 83–96. doi:10.1057/jit.2015.13

Carspecken, P. F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research. Milton Park, UK: Routledge.

Childress, T. (2020). Putting Relationships First: Using principles from Reggio Emilia to be responsive to our students. Childhood Education, 96(6), 46-53. doi:10.1080/00094056.2020.1846386

Chong, I., & Proctor, R.W. (2020). On the evolution of a radical concept: Affordances according to Gibson and their subsequent use and development. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(1), 117-132. doi:10.1177/1745691619868207

Clark, W., & Luckin, R. (2013). What the research says about iPads in the classroom. London, UK: London Knowledge Lab.

Clarke, L., & Abbott, L. (2016). Young pupils’, their teacher’s and classroom assistants’ experiences of iPads in a Northern Ireland school: “Four and five years old, who would have thought they could do that?” British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1051–1064. doi:10.1111/bjet.12266

Conole, G., & Dyke, M. (2004). What are the affordances of information and communication technologies? Alt-Journal Research in Learning Technology, 12(2), 113-124. doi:10.1080/0968776042000216183

Corbin, J.M., & Strauss, A.C. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage.

Cordovil, R., Araújo, D., Pepping, G-J. & Barreiros, J. (2015). An ecological stance on risk and safe behaviors in children: The role of affordances and emergent behaviors. New Ideas in Psychology, 36, 50-59. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.10.007

Costall, A. (1995) Socializing affordances. Theory & Psychology, 5(4), 467–481. doi:10.1177/0959354395054001

Cowan, K. (2019). Digital meaning making: Reggio Emilia-inspired practice in Swedish preschools. Media Education Research Journal, 8(2), 11-29.

Cowan, K., & Flewitt, R. (2021). Moving from paper-based to digital documentation in early childhood education: Democratic potentials and challenges, International Journal of Early Years Education, doi:10.1080/09669760.2021.2013171

Cox, M., Abbott, C., Webb, M., Blakeley, B., Beauchamp, T., & Rhodes, V. (2003). ICT and attainment: A review of the research literature. Becta (ICT in Schools Research and Evaluation Series).

Crook, C. (1994). Computers and the collaborative experience of learning. Milton Park, UK: Routledge.

Czerniewicz, L., & Brown, C. (2012). The habitus of digital “strangers” in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), 44-53. doi:10.1111/j.1467-535.2012.01281.x

Dahlberg, G., & Moss, P. (2006). Our Reggio Emilia. Introduction to C. Rinaldi. In Dialogue with Reggio Emilia: listening, researching and learning (pp.1-22). Milton Park, UK: Routledge.

de Carvalho, E.M. (2020). Social affordance. In J. Vonk & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior (pp. 1-4). London, UK: Springer Nature. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1870-1

deMunck, V.C., & Sobo, E.J. (Eds.). (1998). Using methods in the field: a practical introduction and casebook. Lanham, MD, US: AltaMira.

DeVries, R., Zan, B., Hildebrandt, C., Edmiaston, R., & Sales, C. (2002). Developing constructivist early childhood curriculum: Practical principles and activities. New York, NY, US: Teachers College Press.

Dodd-Nufrio, A.T. (2011). Reggio Emilia, Maria Montessori, and John Dewey: Dispelling teachers’ misconceptions and understanding theoretical foundations. Early Childhood Education Journal, 39, 235–237. doi:10.1007/s10643-011-0451-3

Drennan, G. & Moll, I. (2018). A conceptual understanding of how educational technology coaches help teachers integrate iPad affordances into their teaching. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 16(2), 122-133. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1205781.pdf

Edwards, C.P. (1995). Democratic participation in a community of learners: Loris Malaguzzi's philosophy of education as relationship. Faculty Publications, Department of Child, Youth and Family Studies. 15. University of Nebraska. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/famconfacpub/15

Erickson, F. (2008). Ethnographic description. In U. Ammon, N. Dittmar, K.J. Mattheier & P. Trudgill (Eds.), An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society (2nd ed., pp. 1197-1212). Berlin, DE: De Gruyter Mouton. doi:10.1515/9783110171488.2.7.1197

Erickson, F. (2010). Classroom ethnography. In P. Peterson, E. Baker & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 320-325). Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01560-8

Falanga, G. (2015). Gauteng's paperless classrooms. Retrieved from http://www.iol.co.za/news/south-africa/gauteng/gautengs-paperlessclassrooms-1804443

Fernández-Santín, M., & Feliu-Torruella, M. (2020). Developing critical thinking in early childhood through the philosophy of Reggio Emilia. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100686

Flewitt, R., Messer, D., & Kucirkova, N. (2015). New directions for early literacy in a digital age: The iPad. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 15(3) 289–310. doi:10.1177/1468798414533560

Flewitt, R., & Cowan, K. (2019). Valuing young children’s signs of learning: Observation and digital documentation of play in early years classrooms. The Froebel Trust Final Research Report. Retrieved from https://www.froebel.org.uk/uploads/documents/Froebel-Trust-Final-Report-Cowan-and-Flewitt-Valuing-Young-Childrens-Signs-of-Learning.pdf

Formosinho, J., & Pascal, C. (Eds.). (2017). Introduction. In Assessment and evaluation for transformation in early childhood. (pp. xxi-xxiv). European Early Childhood Education Research Association/Routledge.

Freeman, D. (1968). The fateful hoaxing of Margaret Mead: A historical analysis of her Samoan research. New York, NY, US:Basic Books.

Fripp, C. (2013). South Africa: 1.4 million tablets in three years. IT News Africa, 7. Retrieved from http://www.itnewsafrica.com/2013/07/south-africa-1-4-million-tablets-in-three-years/

Gallagher, A. (2018). E-portfolios and relational space in the early education environment. Journal of Pedagogy, 9(1), 23–44. doi:10.2478/jped-2018-0002

Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In the interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp.3-30). New Yor, NY, US: Basic Books.

Gibson, J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Bransford (Ed.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology. (pp.67-82). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA, US: Houghton Mifflin.

Gottschalk, F. (2019). Impacts of technology use on children: Exploring literature on the brain, cognition and well-being. OECD Education Working Paper No. 195. Paris, FR: OECD Directorate for Education and Skills.

Gray, L., & Lewis, L. (2021). Use of educational technology for instruction in public schools, 2019–20. NCES 2021- 017. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2021017

Haßler, B., Major, L., & Hennessy, S. (2015). Tablet use in schools: A critical review of the evidence for learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(2), 139-156. doi:10.1111/jcal.12123

Halliday, M., & Hasan, R. (1985), Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1983). Ethnography: Principles in practice. Milton Park, UK: Routledge.

Harju, A., & Åkerblom, A. (2020). Opening up new spaces for languaging practice in early childhood education for migrant children. International Journal of Early Years Education, 28(2), 151-161, doi:10.1080/09669760.2020.1765087

Henderson, S., & Yeow, J. (2012). iPads in education: A case study of iPad adoption and use in a primary school. Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, Hawaii, USA. Retrieved from http://www.computer.org/csdl/proceedings/hicss/2012/4525/00/4525a078.pdf

Hewett, V.M. (2001). Examining the Reggio Emilia approach to early childhood education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29(2), 95-100. doi:10.1023/A:1012520828095

Hong, S.B., & Trepanier-Street, M.L. (2004). Technology: A tool for knowledge construction in a Reggio Emilia inspired teacher education program. Early Childhood Education Journal, 32(2), 87-94. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42650

Hooker, T. (2019). Using e-portfolios in early childhood education: Recalling, reconnecting, restarting and learning. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 17(4), 376–391. doi:10.1177/1476718X19875778

Internet World Statistics (2021). Internet users statistics for Africa. Retrieved from https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats1.htm

Jessop, B. (2015). The symptomatology of crises, reading crises and learning from them: Some critical realist reflections. Journal of Critical Realism, 14(3), 238-271. doi:10.1179/1572513815Y.0000000001

Kashin, D. (2016). Digital documentation: making teaching and learning visible. Technology rich inquiry based research, Blog, 2016. Retrieved from https://tecribresearch.wordpress.com/2016/01/02/digital-documentation-making-teaching- and-learning-visible/

Khoo, E., Merry, R., & Bennett, T. (2015). ‘I want to say…’: Privileging young children’s voices in iPad-supported assessment for learning. Early Childhood Folio, 19(1), 3–9. doi:10.18296/ecf.0002

King, R. (1979) All Things Bright and Beautiful?. Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley.

Krechevsky, M., Mardell, B., Filippini, T., & Tedeschi, M. (2016). Children are citizens: The everyday and the razzle-dazzle. Innovations in Early Education, December, 4-15. Retrieved from http://www.pz.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/krechevsky%20mardell%20filippini%20tedeschi-Innov.23.4web.pdf

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. (2nd ed). Milton Park, UK: Routledge.

Kuby, C., & Rucker, T. G. (2020). (Re)thinking children as fully (in)human and literacies as otherwise through (re)etymologizing intervene and inequality. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 20(1), 13–43. doi:10.1177%2F1468798420904774

Kyttä, M. (2002). The affordances of children’s environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22(1), 109–123. doi:10.1006/jevp.2001.0249

Laidlaw, L. & So‐Har Wong, S. (2016). Literacy and complexity: On using technology within emergent learning structures with young learners. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 13(1), 30‐42. doi:10.29173/cmplct24008

Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Milton Park, UK: Routledge.

Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA, US: Sage.

Lindsay, G. M. (2016). John Dewey and Reggio Emilia: Worlds apart - one vision. Australian Art Education, 37(1), 21-37. University of Wollongong Research Online. Retrieved from https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3228&context=sspapers

MacDonald, M. (2007). Toward formative assessment: The use of pedagogical documentation in early elementary classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22, 232–242. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.12.001

Maher, D. (2013). Pre-service primary teachers’ use of iPads to support teaching: Implications for teacher education. Educational Research for Social Change, 2(1), 48-63.

Malaguzzi, L. (1993). History, ideas and basic philosophy. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini & G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach to early childhood education. New York, NY, US: Ablex.

Malaguzzi, L. (1994). Your image of the child: Where teaching begins. Early Childhood Educational Exchange, 96, 52-61. Retrieved from https://www.reggioalliance.org/downloads/malaguzzi:ccie:1994.pdf

Malaguzzi, L. & Gandini, L. (1993). For an education based on relationships. Young Children, 49(1), 9-12. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/42725534

McGrenere, J. & Ho, W. (2000). Affordances: Clarifying and evolving a concept. Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2000, Montréal, Québec, Canada, May 15-17, 179-186. doi:10.20380/GI2000.24

Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA, US: Jossey-Bass.

Meyer, B. (2013). iPads in inclusive classrooms: Ecologies of learning. In D.G. Sampson, J.M. Spector, D. Ifenthaler & P. Isaias (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS) International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age, Fort Worth, Texas: CELDA (pp. 259-266).

Michaels, C.F. (2003). Affordances: Four points of debate. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 135-148. doi:10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_3

Mingers, J., Mutch, A. & Willcocks, L. (2013). Critical realism in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 795-802. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/55184

Mitchell, L.M. (2007). Using technology in Reggio Emilia-inspired programs. Theory Into Practice, 46(1), 32-39. doi:10.1080/00405840709336546

Moll, I. (2012). Learning and computing: theoretical perspectives on the pedagogic integration of ICTs. In K. McCabe & K. van Wyk (Eds.), Teaching and e-learning in the South African classroom. Stuttgart, DE: Macmillan.

Moll, I., Dlamini, R., Ndlovu, N.S., Drennan, G., Nkambule, F., & Phakathi, N. (2022). A developing realist model of the pedagogical affordances of ICTs. South African Computer Journal, 34(2), 50–75. doi:10.18489/sacj.v34i2.1076

Morse, J. (2018). Reframing rigor in qualitative inquiry. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed, pp.1373-1409). Newbury Park, CA, US: Sage.

Ndlovu¸ N.S., & Moll, I. (2016). Teachers, technology and types of media: Teaching with ICTs in South Africa. African Educational Research Journal, 4(3), 124-130.

Neumann, M., & Neumann, D. (2014). Touch screen tablets and emergent literacy. Early Childhood Education Journal, 42(4), 231‐239. doi:10.1007/s10643‐013‐0608‐3

New, R. S. (2007). Reggio Emilia as cultural activity theory in practice. Theory into Practice, 46(1), 5-13. doi:10.1080/00405840709336543

Nkosi, B. (2014). Lesufi's ICT plan for Gauteng Education. Sunday Independent, 29/06/2014, 9.

Nguyen, L., Barton, S.M., & Nguyen, L.T. (2014). iPads in higher education – hype and hope. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1), 190–203. doi:10.1111/bjet.12137

Niemimaa, M. (2018). Affordances and agential realism: A relational ontology for a relational theory. Research paper delivered to the Twenty-Sixth European Conference on Information Systems, Portsmouth, UK, 2018.

Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York, NY, US: Basic Books.

O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., Wignell, P., Wang, R., Chai, K., & Lange, R. (2019). Multimodality: A new discipline. In J. Pflaeging, C-I. Tseng, J. Wildfeuer, J. A. Bateman, & O. Seizov (Eds.), Multimodality: Towards a new discipline. (pp. 35-54). Berlin, DE: De Gruyter.

Parnell, W.A. (2012). How smartphones and tablets are changing documentation in preschool and primary classrooms. Portland State University: Education Faculty Publications. Retrieved from https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1012&context=edu_fac

Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent: The future of Education. New York, NY, US: Penguin Books.

Piaget, J. (2001). Studies in reflecting abstraction. London, UK: Psychology Press.

Plano Clark, V., & Creswell, J. (2015). Understanding research: A consumer’s guide. (2nd ed.). New York, NY, US: Pearson.

Plowman, L., & McPake, J. (2013). Seven myths about young children and technology. Childhood Education, 89(1), 27-33. doi:10.1080/00094056.2013.757490

Ponterotto, J.G. (2006). Brief note on the origins, evolution, and meaning of the qualitative research concept “thick description”. The Qualitative Report, 11(3), 538-549. doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2006.1666

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5). Retrieved from https://www.marcprensky.com/writing/

Reed, A. (2013). iPad’s for teaching and learning? A snapshot of how Iceland is doing it. Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, New Orleans, USA. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (pp. 2927-2931).

Reid, D., & Ostashewski, N. (2011). iPads in the classroom - new technologies, old issues: Are they worth the effort? Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, Lisbon, Portugal. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (pp. 1689-1694).

Republic of South Africa (2011a). Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement: Grades R-3 English Home Language. Department of Basic Education.

Republic of South Africa (2011b). Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement Grades R-3 Life Skills. Department of Basic Education.

Reynolds, B., & Duff, K. (2016). Families’ perceptions of early childhood educators’ fostering conversations and connections by sharing children’s learning through pedagogical documentation. Education 3-13, 44(1), 93-100. doi:10.1080/03004279.2015.1092457

Rinaldi, C. (2021). In dialogue with Reggio Emilia: Listening, researching and learning (2nd ed.). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780367854539