Data and perception of the development of an online teachers' community of pratice: the case of “Don Milani” middle school

Main Article Content

Stefania Donadio
Chiara Cipolli

Abstract

Since 2005, teachers at Don Milani Middle School in Genoa have been using an online communication-cooperation system that the school provides for their exclusive use. The system operates via a web platform, and all members of the teaching staff are required to log in and use it. The hypothesis of this research paper is that, over time, the exchange of good practices and knowledge on this professional development platform has fostered a cultural, professional and community identity, adding quality to the participatory processes and balancing face-to-face and online work. In order to assess how the school’s teaching community has evolved, we have carried out a participatory research project based on a statistical analysis of communication flows, a special questionnaire for teachers, and comparative analysis of the results from that questionnaire with results from an earlier questionnaire submitted in 2008. Comparison of the collected quantitative and qualitative data points to the progressive consolidation of a participatory dimension and a gradual development of a collaboration-based community of practice.

Article Details

Section
Articles - Special Issue

References

Cipolli C., Donadio S. (2013). Questionario di valutazione e

analisi delle attività di comunicazione online nell’ambito

del lavoro docente. Maggio 2013.

http://donmilanicolombo.wikischool.it/file.php/63/

Questionario_monitoraggio_Piattaforma_2013.pdf

(ultima consultazione 28.01.2014).

Cohen D., Prusak L. (2001). In good company. Boston, MA ,

USA: Harvard Business School Press.

Cortigiani P. (2008). La scuola come mente collettiva: la ricerca

organizzativa della “Don Milani” di Genova. TD Tecnologie

Didattiche, 16 (3), pp. 4-12.

http://www.tdjournal.itd.cnr.it/files/pdfarticles/PDF45/

Cortigiani.pdf (ultima consultazione 28.01.2014).

Cortigiani P., Gibelli C. (2010). Progettare, organizzare, riflettere

in rete: comunità di pratica alla scuola media Don Milani

di Genova. Atti del convegno Didamatica 2010 (Roma, 21-

aprile 2010).

http://didamatica2010.di.uniroma1.it/sito/lavori/71-321-

-DR.pdf (ultima consultazione 28.01.2014).

Gibelli C. (2008a). Organizzazione del lavoro in rete: il caso di

una scuola media italiana. TD Tecnologie Didattiche, 16 (3),

pp. 13-22.

http://www.tdjournal.itd.cnr.it/files/pdfarticles/PDF45/Gibelli.

pdf (ultima consultazione 28.01.2014).

Gibelli C. (2008b). Isa Don Milani - Progetto “Scuole laboratorio”:

questionario di autoanalisi sull’attività di comunicazione

e cooperazione online (gennaio 2008).

http://donmilanicolombo.wikischool.it/file.php /63/SEMINARIO%

LAVORO%20IN%20RETE%202008/questionario_

piattaforma_2008.pdf

(ultima consultazione 28.01.2014).

Gibelli C. (2011). Comunicare e cooperare nella scuola: I rischi

di un processo spontaneo.

http://donmilanicolombo.wikischool.it/file. php/63/MONITORAGGIO/

SPUNTI%20DI%20RIFLESSIONE/Comunicare_

e_cooperare_doc_dibattito_-4.pdf

(ultima consultazione 28.01.2014).

Gunawardena C. N. (1995). Social Presence Theory and Implications

for Interaction and Collaborative Learning in Computer

Conferences. International Journal of Educational

Telecommunications, 1 (2), pp. 147-166.

Hermans H., Ligorio M.B. (2005). Dialogo e Tecnologia come laboratori

del Sé. In Ligorio M. B., Hermans H. (eds.). Identità

dialogiche nell’era digitale. Trento, IT: Erickson, pp. 15-40.

Ranieri M., Manca S., Fini A. (2012). Promuovere comunità

professionali di insegnanti e professionisti attraverso i siti di

Social Network. TD Tecnologie Didattiche , 20 (1), pp. 24-30.

Rourke L., Anderson T., Garrison D. R., Archer W. (1999). Assessing

Social Presence in Asynchronous Text-Based Computer

Conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14 (2),

pp. 50-71.

Tu C. (2002). The Measurement of Social Presence in an Online

Learning Environment. International Journal on ELearning,

(2), pp. 34-45.