Technologies and school-family relations
Article Sidebar
Published
Apr 30, 2014
Main Article Content
Abstract
The opinions of those involved
Article Details
Section
Column "Field experiences"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
References
Aguilar M.C., Leiva J. (2012). La participación de las familias en las escuelas TIC: Análisis y reflexiones educativas. Píxel-Bit, Revista de Medios y Educación, 40, pp. 7-19.
Boal C.A. (2004). A three-way partnership with families. Principal, 83 (3), pp. 26-28.
Epstein J.L. (2001). School, family and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. Boulder, CO, USA: Westview Press.
Feito A.R. (2009). Escuelas democráticas. Revista de la Asociación de sociología de la Educación, 2 (1), pp. 17-33.
Florian L., Hegarty J. (eds.) (2004). ICT and Special Educational Needs. A tool for inclusion. London, UK: Open University Press.
Freedman T. (2000). You’ve Got Mail. Managing Schools Today, Ottobre 2000, pp. 27-28.
Hallgarten J. (2000). Parents exist. Ok!?. London, UK: IPPR.
Hohlfeld T.N., Ritzhaupt A.D., Barron A.E. (2010). Connecting schools, community, and family with ICT: Four-year trends related to school level and SES of public schools in Florida. Computers & Education, 55 (1), pp. 391-405.
Lewin C., Luckin R. (2010). Technology to support parental engagement in elementary education: Lessons learned from the UK. Computers & Education, 54, pp. 749-758.
Moss G., Jewitt C. (2010). Policy, pedagogy and interactive whiteboards: what lessons can be learnt from early adoption in England?. In Thomas M., Schmid E.C. (eds.). Interactive Whiteboards for Education: Theory, Research and Practice. Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global, pp. 20-36.
Pieri M. (2005). Virtual communities as bridges between parents and school: the case of an Italian Secondary School. In R.A. Martínez-González, M. Pérez-Herrero, B. Rodríguez-Ruiz (eds.). Family-School-Community Partnerships. Merging into Social Development. Oviedo, ES: Grupo SM, pp. 433-450.
Pieri M. (2012). Disabilità, tecnologie, scuola. Milano, IT: Guerini e Associati editore.
Somekh B., Mavers D., Lewin C. (2001). Using ICT to enhance home-school links: An evaluation of current practice in England. Annesley, Notts, UK: DfES.
Telem M., Pinto S. (2006). Information technology’s impact on school-parents and parents student interrelations: a case study. Computers & Education, 47 (3), pp. 260-279.
Boal C.A. (2004). A three-way partnership with families. Principal, 83 (3), pp. 26-28.
Epstein J.L. (2001). School, family and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. Boulder, CO, USA: Westview Press.
Feito A.R. (2009). Escuelas democráticas. Revista de la Asociación de sociología de la Educación, 2 (1), pp. 17-33.
Florian L., Hegarty J. (eds.) (2004). ICT and Special Educational Needs. A tool for inclusion. London, UK: Open University Press.
Freedman T. (2000). You’ve Got Mail. Managing Schools Today, Ottobre 2000, pp. 27-28.
Hallgarten J. (2000). Parents exist. Ok!?. London, UK: IPPR.
Hohlfeld T.N., Ritzhaupt A.D., Barron A.E. (2010). Connecting schools, community, and family with ICT: Four-year trends related to school level and SES of public schools in Florida. Computers & Education, 55 (1), pp. 391-405.
Lewin C., Luckin R. (2010). Technology to support parental engagement in elementary education: Lessons learned from the UK. Computers & Education, 54, pp. 749-758.
Moss G., Jewitt C. (2010). Policy, pedagogy and interactive whiteboards: what lessons can be learnt from early adoption in England?. In Thomas M., Schmid E.C. (eds.). Interactive Whiteboards for Education: Theory, Research and Practice. Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global, pp. 20-36.
Pieri M. (2005). Virtual communities as bridges between parents and school: the case of an Italian Secondary School. In R.A. Martínez-González, M. Pérez-Herrero, B. Rodríguez-Ruiz (eds.). Family-School-Community Partnerships. Merging into Social Development. Oviedo, ES: Grupo SM, pp. 433-450.
Pieri M. (2012). Disabilità, tecnologie, scuola. Milano, IT: Guerini e Associati editore.
Somekh B., Mavers D., Lewin C. (2001). Using ICT to enhance home-school links: An evaluation of current practice in England. Annesley, Notts, UK: DfES.
Telem M., Pinto S. (2006). Information technology’s impact on school-parents and parents student interrelations: a case study. Computers & Education, 47 (3), pp. 260-279.