Danze rare e contemporanee come mediatori culturali in un contesto di apprendimento blended: la prospettiva della fuzzy logic

Barra laterale dell'articolo

IJET cover
PDF (Inglese)
Pubblicato: Jul 30, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/1033
Parole chiave:
Learning Management System Moodle, Qualità dell’interazione, Blended Learning, Pedagogical planning, Danze rare e contemporanee, Fuzzy Logic, Tecnologie didattiche, Tecnologie per l'apprendimento.

Contenuto principale dell'articolo

Sofia B. Dias
Faculty of Human Kinetics
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8239-583X
Sofia J. Hadjileontiadou
Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis
José A. Diniz
University of Lisbon
Stelios Hadjidimitriou
Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Vasileios Charisis
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Leontios J. Hadjileontiadis
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

Abstract

In questo contributo vengono descritti due corsi universitari rispettivamente in danze rare e contemporanee, che sono considerati mediatori culturali. I corsi, erogati in modalità blended, sono stati analizzati con un approccio basato sulla Fuzzy Logic (FL). In particolare, nell’esperienza le interazioni on line degli studenti con una piattaforma Moodle sono state registrate attraverso i file di log durante i corsi per tutta la durata dell’anno accademico, e i dati risultanti sono stati analizzati usando la FL, al fine di stimare la Qualità dell’Interazione (QdI) degli utenti col sistema. Mediante l’analisi documentale, per ogni semestre la progettazione didattica dei corsi è stata rappresentata con mappe concettuali e successivamente messa in relazione con la QdI dinamicamente stimata (per settimana). Quest’ultima è stata utilizzata dai docenti alla fine del primo semestre per riflettere sulla progettazione didattica e aggiornarla, così da potenziare la QdI nel secondo semestre. I risultati dell’esperienza mostrano il ruolo benefico della QdI nel supportare un design più dinamico degli scenari educativi, anche considerando le tendenze e gli atteggiamenti intrinseci dell'interazione degli utenti all'interno delle diverse espressioni culturali.

Dettagli dell'articolo

Fascicolo
V. 26 N. 2 (2018): Dossier: Educational technology and Tangible-Intangible Cultural Heritage
Sezione
Articoli - Dossier

Gli autori che pubblicano su questa rivista accettano le seguenti condizioni:

  1. Gli autori mantengono i diritti sulla loro opera e cedono alla rivista il diritto di prima pubblicazione dell'opera, contemporaneamente licenziata sotto una Licenza Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 Attribution 4.0 International License.
  2. Gli autori possono aderire ad altri accordi di licenza non esclusiva per la distribuzione della versione dell'opera pubblicata (es. depositarla in un archivio istituzionale o pubblicarla in una monografia), a patto di indicare che la prima pubblicazione è avvenuta su questa rivista.
  3. Gli autori possono diffondere la loro opera online (es. in repository istituzionali o nel loro sito web) prima e durante il processo di submission, poiché può portare a scambi produttivi e aumentare le citazioni dell'opera pubblicata (Vedi The effect of Open Access).
Biografie autore

Sofia B. Dias, Faculty of Human Kinetics

University of Lisbon

Sofia J. Hadjileontiadou, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis

Department of Primary Level Education

José A. Diniz, University of Lisbon

Faculty of Human Kinetics

Stelios Hadjidimitriou, Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

Department of Electrical and Computer

Vasileios Charisis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Leontios J. Hadjileontiadis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Riferimenti bibliografici

Antoniou, P. (2014). The Video in Teaching Dance. The Approach of YouTube. Science of Dance, 7, 11-46.

Antoniou, P., Apostolakis, N., Anastasiades, P., & Karipidis, A. (2009). Teaching physical education issues in the compulsory education using digital learning environments. In A. Méndez-Vilas, A. Solano Martín, J.A. Mesa González & J. Mesa González (Eds.), Research, Reflections and Innovations in Integrating ICT in Education (pp. 819-824). Badajoz, SP: Formatex.

Bannerman, C. (2009). Viewing a/New: The Landscape of Dance in 2009. Research in Dance Education, 10(3), 231-240. doi:10.1080/14647890903347114

Bannon, F. (2010). Dance: The possibilities of a discipline. Research in Dance Education, 11(1), 49-59. doi:10.1080/14647890903568313

Biehl, B. (2017). Dance and Organization: Integrating Dance Theory and Methods into the Study of Management. Oxon, UK: Taylor & Francis.

Birringer, J. (2002). Digital performance: Dance and media technologies. Performing Art Journal, 24(1), 84-93.

Buck, R. (2006). Teaching Dance in the Curriculum. In D. Kirk, D. Macdonald, and M. O’Sullivan (Eds.), Handbook of Research in Physical Education (pp. 703-719). London, UK: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781848608009.n39

Caldwell, L. A., & Milling-Robbins, S. (2007). Teaching dance in an online setting. Journal of Dance Education, 7(1), 25-29. doi: 10.1080/15290824.2007.10387329

Colombi, E., & Knosp, S. (2017). Teaching Dance with Online Course Management Systems. Journal of Dance Education, 17(2), 73-76. doi:10.1080/15290824.2016.1228108

Damianakis, A., Tsadima, E., & Tsatsos, D. (2009). OpenDance: A program for learning traditional dances with the use of distance education learning tools. In P. Politis (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1st Educational Congress “Incorporation and use of ICT in the educational process”, Volos, Greece (in Greek).

Dania, A., Tyrovola, V., Koutsouba, M., & Hatziharistos, D. (2012). Labankido©: The Evaluation of a Multimedia Tool Designed for the Teaching of Basic Skills and Concepts in Dance Education. International Journal of Sport & Society, 3(3), 137-148.

Dania, A., Κoutsouba, M., & Tyrovola, V. (2015). The ability of using symbols and its contribution to dance learning: The Laban notation system. Choros International Dance Journal, 4, 37-49.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teacher Education and the American Future. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 35-47. doi:10.1177/0022487109348024

Davenport, D. (2017). Dance is Academic. Journal of Dance Education, 17(1), 34-36. doi:10.1080/15290824.2016.1177642

Desmond, J. (1997). Meaning in motion: New cultural studies of dance. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Dias, S. B., & Diniz, J. A. (2013). FuzzyQoI Model: A fuzzy logic-based modelling of users' quality of interaction with a learning management system under blended learning. Computers & Education, 69, 38-59. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.016

Dias, S. B., Diniz, J. A., & Hadjileontiadis, L. J. (2014). On Enhancing Blended-Learning Scenarios through Fuzzy Logic-Based Modeling of Users’ LMS Quality of Interaction: The Rare & Contemporary Dance Paradigms. In S. Battiato (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphic (Visigrapp/Iamich 2014) Vol. 2 (pp. 765-772). Lisbon, PT: Science and Technology Publications (Scitepress). doi: 10.5220/0004861507650772

Dias, S. B., Diniz, J. A., & Hadjileontiadis, L. J. (2014a). Towards an Intelligent Learning Management System under Blended Learning: Trends, Profiles and Modelling Perspectives. Berlin/Heidelberg, DE: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02078-5

Doughty, S., & Stevens, J. (2002). Seeing Myself Dance: Video and Reflective Learning in Dance Technique. Paper presented at the ‘Finding the Balance’ conference on Dance in FE and HE in the 21st Century. Liverpool, UK: John Moore’s University.

Doughty, S., Francksen, K., Huxley, M. & Leach, M. (2008). Technological Enhancements in the Teaching and Learning of Reflective and Creative Practice in Dance. Research in Dance Education, 9(2), 129-146. doi:10.1080/14647890802088041

Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple intelligences: New horizons. (completely revised and updated). New York, NY: Basic Books.

Goulimaris, D. (2015). The relation between distance education students’ motivation and satisfaction. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 13-27. doi:10.17718/tojde.50678

Grant, M. R., & Thornton, H. R. (2007). Best Practices in undergraduate adult-centered online learning: mechanisms for course design and delivery. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(4), 346-356.

Gratsiouni, D., Koutsouba, M., Venetsanou, F., & Tyrovola, V. (2016). Learning and Digital Environment of Dance–The Case of Greek Traditional Dance in YouTube. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 19(2), 80-95.

Hijón, R. N. & Velázquez, A. I. (2010). From the discovery of students access patterns in e-learning including Web 2.0 resources to the prediction and enhancement of students outcome, e-learning experiences and future. In S. Soomro (Ed.). E-learning Experiences and Future, InTech (chapter 14, pp. 276-294). doi:10.5772/8802

Huddy, A. (2017). Digital technology in the tertiary dance technique studio: expanding student engagement through collaborative and co-creative experiences. Research in Dance Education, 18(2), 174-189. doi:10.1080/14647893.2017.1330327

Kavakli, E., Bakogianni, S., Damianakis, A., Loumou, M., & Tsatsos, D. (2004). Traditional dance and e-learning: The WEBDANCE learning environment. In International Conference on Theory and Applications of Mathematics and Informatics (ICTAMI 2004) (pp.272-281). Thessaloniki, GR.

Lampert, M. (2010). Learning Teaching in, from, and for Practice: What Do We Mean? Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 21-34. doi:10.1177/0022487109347321

Leijen, Ä., Lam, I. & Simons, P. R. J. (2008). Pedagogical Practices of Reflection in tertiary Dance Education. European Physical Education Review, 4(2), 223-241. doi:10.1177/1356336X08090707

Leijen, Ä., Admiraal, W., Wildschut, L., & Robert‐Jan Simons, P. (2008a). Students’ perspectives on e‐learning and the use of a virtual learning environment in Dance education. Research in Dance Education, 9(2), 147-162. doi:10.1080/14647890802087951

Leijen, Ä., Admiraal, W., Lam, I., Wildschut, L., & Simons, P. R. J. (2008b). A Pedagogy before Technology: What should and ICT Intervention Facilitate in Practical Dance Classes? Teaching in Higher Education, 13(2), 219-321. doi:10.1080/13562510801923351

Leijen, Ä., Lam, I., Wildschut, L. & Simon, P. R. J. (2009). Difficulties Teachers Report about Students’ Reflection: Lessons Learned from Dance Education. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(3), 315-326. doi:10.1080/13562510902898882

Leijen, Ä., Lam, I., Wildschut, L., Simons, P. R. J., & Admiraal, W. (2009a). Streaming Video to Enhance Students’ Reflection in Dance Education. Computers & Education, 52, 169-176. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.010

Leo, L. (2007). Corposcopio: An interactive installation performance in the intersection of ritual, dance and new technologies. Technoetic Arts, 5(2), 113-117. doi:10.1386/tear.5.2.113_1

Lepczyk, B. (2009). Technology Facilitates Teaching and Learning in Creative Dance. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 80, 4-8. doi:10.1080/07303084.2009.10598330

Levy, Y. A., & Weld, S. D. (2000). Intelligent Internet Systems. Artificial Intelligence, 118, 1-14. doi:10.1016/S0004-3702(00)00013-8

Morris, G. (2012). Problems with Ballet: Steps, Style and Training. Research in Dance Education, 4(1), 17-30.

Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1996). Learning How to Learn. Cambridge University Press. New York.

Olimpo, G., Bottino, R. M., Earp, J., Ott, M., Pozzi, F., & Tavella, M. (2010). Pedagogical Plans as communication oriented objects. Computers & Education, 55(2), 476-488. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.011

Ping, T. A., Cheng, A. Y., & Manoharan, K. (2010). Students’ interaction in the online learning management systems: A comparative study of undergraduate and postgraduate courses. In Proceedings of the AAOU-2010 Annual Conference (pp. 1-14). doi:10.1108/AAOUJ-06-01-2011-B007

Popat, S., & Smith-Autard, J. (2002). Dance-making on the internet: can on-line choreographic projects foster creativity in the user-participant? Leonardo, 35(1), 31-36. doi:10.1162/002409402753689281

Pozzi, F., Ceregini, A. Dagnino, F., Ott, M. & Tavella M. (2016). Closing the "learning design lifecycle" with the Pedagogical Planner. European Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 103-116.

Risner, D., & Anderson, J. (2008). Digital Dance Literacy: An Integrated Dance Technology Curriculum Pilot Project. Research in Dance Education, 9(2), 111-126. doi:10.1080/14647890802087787

Tsoukalas, H. L., & Uhrig R. E. (1996). Fuzzy and Neural Approaches in Engineering. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.

Wall, J. (2012). Strategically integrating blended learning to deliver lifelong learning. In J. L. Moore (Ed.) International Perspectives of Distance Learning in Higher Education (pp 133-148). Rijeka, HR: InTech. doi: 10.5772/34686

Zadeh, A. L. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338-353. doi:10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X

Zeichner, K. (2006). Reflections of a University-based Teacher Educator on the Future of College- and University-based Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 326-340. doi:10.1177/0022487105285893