ELEMENTI DI GIOCO IN CLASSE: IL RUOLO DELLA SFIDA E DELLA TECNOLOGIA
Barra laterale dell'articolo
Pubblicato:
Jun 14, 2019
Parole chiave:
Gamification, Tecnologie Educative, Innovazione Didattica, Apprendimento Induttivo, Valutazione Formativa, Tecnologie Didattiche, Tecnologie per l'Apprendimento
Contenuto principale dell'articolo
Abstract
L’articolo illustra una metodologia didattica che applica i meccanismi motivazionali del gioco per cercare di superare il diffuso disinteresse degli studenti e rendere coinvolgente l’apprendimento a scuola. È dettagliato un ciclo di apprendimento che promuove un processo di innovazione lungo tre dimensioni: dalla didattica deduttiva a quella induttiva; dalla didattica trasmissiva a quella costruttivista; da una valutazione sommativa a una formativa. Vengono forniti e discussi alcuni esempi concreti di attività didattiche. Infine sono presentati i risultati relativi alle implicazioni motivazionali della metodologia emersi da uno studio quasi-sperimentale condotto in una scuola secondaria di secondo grado. Lo studio ha messo a confronto due classi, sperimentale e di controllo, in relazione alle seguenti variabili: motivazione ad apprendere, bisogni psicologici fondamentali e supporto all’autonomia. I risultati evidenziano come nel confronto si riscontrino differenze significative sulle variabili analizzate, suggerendo che la metodologia proposta possa essere efficace nel determinare cambiamenti positivi nelle dinamiche motivazionali.
Dettagli dell'articolo
Sezione
Articoli - Numero speciale
Gli autori che pubblicano su questa rivista accettano le seguenti condizioni:
- Gli autori mantengono i diritti sulla loro opera e cedono alla rivista il diritto di prima pubblicazione dell'opera, contemporaneamente licenziata sotto una Licenza Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Gli autori possono aderire ad altri accordi di licenza non esclusiva per la distribuzione della versione dell'opera pubblicata (es. depositarla in un archivio istituzionale o pubblicarla in una monografia), a patto di indicare che la prima pubblicazione è avvenuta su questa rivista.
- Gli autori possono diffondere la loro opera online (es. in repository istituzionali o nel loro sito web) prima e durante il processo di submission, poiché può portare a scambi produttivi e aumentare le citazioni dell'opera pubblicata (Vedi The effect of Open Access).
Riferimenti bibliografici
Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1-14. doi:10.1080/07294360.2014.934336
Alivernini, F., & Lucidi, F. (2008). The Academic Motivation Scale (AMS): Factorial structure, invariance and validity in the Italian context. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 15, 211–220.
Ames, C. (1990). Motivation: What teachers need to know. Teachers College Record, 91(3), 409-421.
Anolli, L., & Mantovani, F. (2011). Come funziona la nostra mente. Apprendimento, simulazione e Serious Games. Bologna, IT: il Mulino.
Antinucci, F. (2001). La scuola si è rotta. Roma-Bari, IT: Laterza.
Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanessian, H. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York, NY, USA: Holt Rinehart and Wilson.
Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill.
Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21-32.
Calvani, A. (Ed.). (2007). Tecnologia, scuola, processi cognitivi: per una ecologia dell'apprendere. Milano, IT: Franco Angeli.
Cecchinato, G., & Papa, R. (2016). Flipped classroom: Un nuovo modo di insegnare e apprendere. Torino, IT: UTET Università.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Erlbaum.
Covington, M. V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 171-200.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1024-1037. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1024
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life's domains. Canadian Psychology, 49(1), 14-23.
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification. Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments, Tampere, Finland.
Dewey, J. (2007). Experience and education. New York, NY, USA: Simon and Schuster.
Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in education: a systematic mapping study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 75-88.
Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University Press.
Foschi, L. C., & Cecchinato, G. (2018). Flipped classroom: risultati di una sperimentazione condotta presso l'IIS Bosso-Monti di Torino. RicercAzione, 10(1), 195-216.
Freudenthal, H. (2006). Revisiting mathematics education: China lectures (Vol. 9). Amsterdam, NL: Springer Science & Business Media.
Gee, J. P. (2003). What Video Games Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy. New York, NY, USA: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., & Chanal, J. (2008). Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of self-determination in education. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 233-240.
Hamari, J., Shernoff, D. J., Rowe, E., Coller, B., Asbell-Clarke, J., & Edwards, T. (2016). Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 170-179.
Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers & Education, 80, 152-161. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.019
Hardre, P. L., & Reeve, J. (2003). A motivational model of rural students' intentions to persist in, versus drop out of, high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 347-356. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.347
Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A. J. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Jonassen, D. H. (2008). Meaningful learning with technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.
King, A. (1993). From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College teaching, 41(1), 30-35.
Legault, L., Green-Demers, I., & Pelletier, L. (2006). Why do high school students lack motivation in the classroom? Toward an understanding of academic amotivation and the role of social support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 567-582. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.567
Maehr, M. L., & Meyer, H. A. (1997). Understanding motivation and schooling: Where we've been, where we are, and where we need to go. Educational Psychology Review, 9(4), 371-409. doi: 10.1023/A:1024750807365.
Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory into practice, 41(4), 226-232. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_4
McClean, S., & Crowe, W. (2017). Making room for interactivity: using the cloud-based audience response system Nearpod to enhance engagement in lectures. FEMS microbiology letters, 364(6). doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnx052
Mekler, E. D., Brühlmann, F., Tuch, A. N., & Opwis, K. (2017). Towards understanding the effects of individual gamification elements on intrinsic motivation and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 525-534.
Meyer, D. (2015). Missing the promise of mathematical modeling. Mathematics Teacher, 108(8), 578-583.
Nichol, J., & Watson, K. (2003). Rhetoric and reality - the present and future of ICT in education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 131-136.
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. doi: 10.1080/03075070600572090
Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education, 86(4), 548-571. doi: 10.1002/sce.10032
O’Mahony, T.K., Vye, N.J., Bransford, J.D., Sanders, E.A., Stevens, R., Stephens, R.D., & Soleiman, M.K. (2012). A comparison of lecture-based and challenge based learning in a workplace setting: Course designs, patterns of interactivity, and learning outcomes. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), 182-206. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2011.611775
Persico, D., Dagnino, F., Earp, J., Manganello, F., Passarelli, M., Pozzi, F., ... Bailey, C. (2017). Report on interviews with experts and informants. Gaming Horizons Deliverable D2.3. Retrieved from https://www.gaminghorizons.eu/deliverables/
Piaget, J. (1974). La prise de conscience. Paris, FR: PUF.
Prensky, M. (2006). Don't bother me, Mom, I'm learning! How computer and video games are preparing your kids for 21st century success and how you can help!. St. Paul, MN, USA: Paragon House.
Prensky, M. (2010). Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Corwin Press.
Ranieri, M. (2011). Le insidie dell’ovvio. Tecnologie educative e critica della retorica tecno centrica. Pisa, IT: Edizioni ETS.
Russell, T. L. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon: As reported in 355 research reports, summaries and papers. Raleigh, NC, USA: North Carolina State University.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In R. M. Ryan, & E. L. Deci (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3-33). Rochester, NY, USA: University of Rochester Press.
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144. doi: 10.1007/BF00117714
Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31-38.
Schultz, W. (2007) Behavioral dopamine signals. Trends in Neurosciences, 30, 203-210.
Schwartz, D. L., Lin, X., Brophy, S., & Bransford, J. D. (1999). Toward the development of flexibly adaptive instructional designs. Hillsdale, MI, USA: Erlbaum.
Serres, M. (2013). Non è un mondo per vecchi. Perché i ragazzi rivoluzionano il sapere. Torino, IT: Bollati Boringhieri.
Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall.
Tian, L., Han, M., & Huebner, E. S. (2014). Preliminary development of the adolescent students' basic psychological needs at school scale. Journal of Adolescence, 37(3), 257-267. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.01.005
Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.
Vallerand, R. J., & Ratelle, C. F. (2002). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A hierarchical model. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 37–64). Rochester, NY, USA: University of Rochester Press.
Vallerand, R. J., Fortier, M. S., & Guay, F. (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1161–1176. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1161
Vallerand, R. J., Koestner, R., & Pelletier, L. G. (2008). Reflections on self-determination theory. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 257-262.
Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41(1), 19-31.
Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., Dochy, F., Mouratidis, A., ...Wim Beyers (2012). Identifying configurations of perceived teacher autonomy support and structure: Associations with self-regulated learning, motivation and problem behavior. Learning and Instruction, 22(6), 431-439. Retrieved from http://selfdeterminationtheory.org/SDT/documents/2012VansteenkisteLI.pdf
Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 246-260.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
Willingham, D. T. (2009). Why don't students like school? A cognitive scientist answers questions about how the mind works and what it means for the classroom. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass.
Wouters, P., van Nimwegen, C., van Oostendorp, H., & van Der Spek, E. D. (2013). A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 249-265.
Alivernini, F., & Lucidi, F. (2008). The Academic Motivation Scale (AMS): Factorial structure, invariance and validity in the Italian context. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 15, 211–220.
Ames, C. (1990). Motivation: What teachers need to know. Teachers College Record, 91(3), 409-421.
Anolli, L., & Mantovani, F. (2011). Come funziona la nostra mente. Apprendimento, simulazione e Serious Games. Bologna, IT: il Mulino.
Antinucci, F. (2001). La scuola si è rotta. Roma-Bari, IT: Laterza.
Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanessian, H. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York, NY, USA: Holt Rinehart and Wilson.
Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill.
Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21-32.
Calvani, A. (Ed.). (2007). Tecnologia, scuola, processi cognitivi: per una ecologia dell'apprendere. Milano, IT: Franco Angeli.
Cecchinato, G., & Papa, R. (2016). Flipped classroom: Un nuovo modo di insegnare e apprendere. Torino, IT: UTET Università.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Erlbaum.
Covington, M. V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 171-200.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1024-1037. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1024
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life's domains. Canadian Psychology, 49(1), 14-23.
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification. Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments, Tampere, Finland.
Dewey, J. (2007). Experience and education. New York, NY, USA: Simon and Schuster.
Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in education: a systematic mapping study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 75-88.
Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University Press.
Foschi, L. C., & Cecchinato, G. (2018). Flipped classroom: risultati di una sperimentazione condotta presso l'IIS Bosso-Monti di Torino. RicercAzione, 10(1), 195-216.
Freudenthal, H. (2006). Revisiting mathematics education: China lectures (Vol. 9). Amsterdam, NL: Springer Science & Business Media.
Gee, J. P. (2003). What Video Games Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy. New York, NY, USA: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., & Chanal, J. (2008). Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of self-determination in education. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 233-240.
Hamari, J., Shernoff, D. J., Rowe, E., Coller, B., Asbell-Clarke, J., & Edwards, T. (2016). Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 170-179.
Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers & Education, 80, 152-161. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.019
Hardre, P. L., & Reeve, J. (2003). A motivational model of rural students' intentions to persist in, versus drop out of, high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 347-356. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.347
Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A. J. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Jonassen, D. H. (2008). Meaningful learning with technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.
King, A. (1993). From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College teaching, 41(1), 30-35.
Legault, L., Green-Demers, I., & Pelletier, L. (2006). Why do high school students lack motivation in the classroom? Toward an understanding of academic amotivation and the role of social support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 567-582. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.567
Maehr, M. L., & Meyer, H. A. (1997). Understanding motivation and schooling: Where we've been, where we are, and where we need to go. Educational Psychology Review, 9(4), 371-409. doi: 10.1023/A:1024750807365.
Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory into practice, 41(4), 226-232. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_4
McClean, S., & Crowe, W. (2017). Making room for interactivity: using the cloud-based audience response system Nearpod to enhance engagement in lectures. FEMS microbiology letters, 364(6). doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnx052
Mekler, E. D., Brühlmann, F., Tuch, A. N., & Opwis, K. (2017). Towards understanding the effects of individual gamification elements on intrinsic motivation and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 525-534.
Meyer, D. (2015). Missing the promise of mathematical modeling. Mathematics Teacher, 108(8), 578-583.
Nichol, J., & Watson, K. (2003). Rhetoric and reality - the present and future of ICT in education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 131-136.
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. doi: 10.1080/03075070600572090
Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education, 86(4), 548-571. doi: 10.1002/sce.10032
O’Mahony, T.K., Vye, N.J., Bransford, J.D., Sanders, E.A., Stevens, R., Stephens, R.D., & Soleiman, M.K. (2012). A comparison of lecture-based and challenge based learning in a workplace setting: Course designs, patterns of interactivity, and learning outcomes. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), 182-206. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2011.611775
Persico, D., Dagnino, F., Earp, J., Manganello, F., Passarelli, M., Pozzi, F., ... Bailey, C. (2017). Report on interviews with experts and informants. Gaming Horizons Deliverable D2.3. Retrieved from https://www.gaminghorizons.eu/deliverables/
Piaget, J. (1974). La prise de conscience. Paris, FR: PUF.
Prensky, M. (2006). Don't bother me, Mom, I'm learning! How computer and video games are preparing your kids for 21st century success and how you can help!. St. Paul, MN, USA: Paragon House.
Prensky, M. (2010). Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Corwin Press.
Ranieri, M. (2011). Le insidie dell’ovvio. Tecnologie educative e critica della retorica tecno centrica. Pisa, IT: Edizioni ETS.
Russell, T. L. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon: As reported in 355 research reports, summaries and papers. Raleigh, NC, USA: North Carolina State University.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In R. M. Ryan, & E. L. Deci (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3-33). Rochester, NY, USA: University of Rochester Press.
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144. doi: 10.1007/BF00117714
Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31-38.
Schultz, W. (2007) Behavioral dopamine signals. Trends in Neurosciences, 30, 203-210.
Schwartz, D. L., Lin, X., Brophy, S., & Bransford, J. D. (1999). Toward the development of flexibly adaptive instructional designs. Hillsdale, MI, USA: Erlbaum.
Serres, M. (2013). Non è un mondo per vecchi. Perché i ragazzi rivoluzionano il sapere. Torino, IT: Bollati Boringhieri.
Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall.
Tian, L., Han, M., & Huebner, E. S. (2014). Preliminary development of the adolescent students' basic psychological needs at school scale. Journal of Adolescence, 37(3), 257-267. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.01.005
Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.
Vallerand, R. J., & Ratelle, C. F. (2002). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A hierarchical model. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 37–64). Rochester, NY, USA: University of Rochester Press.
Vallerand, R. J., Fortier, M. S., & Guay, F. (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1161–1176. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1161
Vallerand, R. J., Koestner, R., & Pelletier, L. G. (2008). Reflections on self-determination theory. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 257-262.
Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41(1), 19-31.
Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., Dochy, F., Mouratidis, A., ...Wim Beyers (2012). Identifying configurations of perceived teacher autonomy support and structure: Associations with self-regulated learning, motivation and problem behavior. Learning and Instruction, 22(6), 431-439. Retrieved from http://selfdeterminationtheory.org/SDT/documents/2012VansteenkisteLI.pdf
Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 246-260.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
Willingham, D. T. (2009). Why don't students like school? A cognitive scientist answers questions about how the mind works and what it means for the classroom. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass.
Wouters, P., van Nimwegen, C., van Oostendorp, H., & van Der Spek, E. D. (2013). A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 249-265.