Strumenti per la progettazione nell'e-learning

Contenuto principale dell'articolo

Serena Alvino
Luigi Sarti

Abstract

Analisi degli strumenti di supporto disponibile per facilitare e potenziare la progettazione di attività didattiche (Learning Design). Tali strumenti forniscono rappresentazioni multiple e consentano punti di vista diversi sui processi in atto.

Dettagli dell'articolo

Sezione
Articoli - Numero speciale

Riferimenti bibliografici

Alvino S., Sarti L. (2004), Learning Objects e Costruttivismo, Atti Didamatica 2004, Consorzio Omniacom Ed., Ferrara, pp. 761-772.

Alvino S., Fini A., Sarti L. (in stampa), Oltre i learning object: dal modellare i contenuti al modellare i processi didattici, in Delogu C. (a cura di) Tecnologia per il web learning: realtà e scenari, Milano, Guerini.

Bailey K.D. (1985), Metodi della ricerca sociale, Il Mulino, Bologna. Calvani A. (2002), E-learning: tipologie e criticità nel contesto universitario, Form@re, marzo – Editoriale. http://www.formare.erickson.it/ar chivio/marzo_aprile/ editoriale.html

Dalziel J. (2003), Implementing Learning Design: The Learning Activity Management System (LAMS), in Crisp G., Thiele D., Scholten I., Barker S. & Baron J. (eds) Interact, Integrate, Impact: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Adelaide, 7-10 dicembre 2003.

Hernández-Leo D., Asensio-Perez J. I., Dimitriadis Y. (2005a), Computational Representation of Collaborative Learning Flow Patterns using IMS Learning Design, Educational Technology & Society, 8 (4), pp. 75- 89.

Hernández-Leo D., Asensio-Pérez J.I., Dimitriadis Y., Bote-Lorenzo M.L., Jorrín-Abellán I.M., Villasclaras- Fernández E.D. (2005b), Reusing IMS-LD Formalized Best Practices in Collaborative Learning Structuring, Advanced Technology for Learning, 2(3), pp.223-232.

IMS (2003), Learning Design v 1.0 Final Specification. http://www.imsglobal.org/ learningdesign/index.cfm

Ip A., Morrison I. (2001), Learning objects in different pedagogical paradigms, in Kennedy G., Keppell M., McNaught C. & Petrovic T. (eds), Meeting at the Crossroads. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Melbourne: Biomedical Multimedia Unit, The University of Melbourne, pp. 289-298. http://users.tpg.com.au/adslfrcf/ lo/LO(ASCILITE2001).pdf

Koper E.J.R. (2001), Modelling Units of Study from a Pedagogical Perspective: the pedagogical metamodel behind EML, Heerlen, Open Universiteit Nederland. http://eml.ou.nl/introduction/ docs/ped-metamodel.pdf

Losero I. (2006), Appunti sugli standard per la formazione a distanza, http://www.lulu.com/content/ 300824

Midoro V. (2002), Introduzione, in Midoro V. (a cura di) E-learning. Apprendere insieme in rete, Menabò, Ortona (CH).

Persico D., Sarti L. (2005), Social structures for online learning: a design perspective, in Chiazzese G. et al. (eds) Methods and Technologies for Learning, Proc. First Int. Conf. on Methods and Technologies for Learning, WIT Press, Southhampton, Boston, pp.51-60.

Stockley D. (2002), E-learning Definition and Explanation (Elearning, Online Training, Online Learning). http://members.ozemail.com.au/~ derekstockley/helearn.html

Tsai S., Machado P. (2002), E-Learning, Online Learning, Web-based Learning, or Distance Learning: Unveiling the Ambiguity in Current Terminology, InkiTiki Corporation, Island of Kauai, Hawaii. http://www.elearnmag.org/ subpage/sub_page.cfm? section=3&list_item=6&page=1

Varisco B.M. (2002), Costruttivismo Socio-culturale, Carocci.

Wiley D.A. (ed) (2000),The Instructional Use of Learning Objects. Online Version. http://reusability.org/read/ chapters/chitwood.doc